rmc523 Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I can't help thinking that all those vehicles mentioned would have been approved while in bankruptcy, or is that not the case? Doesn't that make it worse? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
351cid Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Remember the last diesel Caddy sold in the US? I worked on those turds and remember them well...and so do a lot of people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-150 Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Remember the last diesel Caddy sold in the US? I worked on those turds and remember them well...and so do a lot of people. Luckily Caddy has an entirely new buyer that doesn't remember their tripe of the 80s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 I remember my friend's Buick or Olds diesel in the late 70s/early 80s. It almost left us stranded in the middle of nowhere one night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
351cid Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Luckily Caddy has an entirely new buyer that doesn't remember their tripe of the 80s. Granted. There are a lot of folks that listen to their parents when it comes to buying cars. A lot of the generation that is buying Toyota now is buying them because their parents had "bad luck" with domestics in the 70's. Their parents bought and drive Toyota & Honda, so they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
351cid Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 I remember my friend's Buick or Olds diesel in the late 70s/early 80s. It almost left us stranded in the middle of nowhere one night. What is really sad about the 5.7L converted diesel is that GM went 90% with the design. Had they finished the design and had better training at the dealership level, then I think it would have been more effective in its intention. Larger head bolts and more durable fuel pump (along with a water seperator) would have gone a long way at curing its evils. A nice turbo would have helped with that 125 hp, but the main bolts were too weak for what was in place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardJensen Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Luckily Caddy has an entirely new buyer that doesn't remember their tripe of the 80s. While there are younger people buying Cadillacs, the evidence suggests that many--if not most--Cadillac buyers can clearly remember those things: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2014/10/buick-and-cadillac-continue-to-attract-the-oldest-buyers/ 59.3 = late 20s when GM tried to inflict the bustle back Seville on an uncooperative public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgts Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 What is really sad about the 5.7L converted diesel is that GM went 90% with the design. Had they finished the design and had better training at the dealership level, then I think it would have been more effective in its intention. Larger head bolts and more durable fuel pump (along with a water seperator) would have gone a long way at curing its evils. A nice turbo would have helped with that 125 hp, but the main bolts were too weak for what was in place. Think this what GM did with the following 6.2/6.2 turbo that got replaced by Duramax in trucks. The 6.2 is still used in Humvees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.