Jump to content

70 Stang

Member
  • Posts

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by 70 Stang

  1. I know we'll find out soon, but does anyone have an idea of general size. On another site, a guy said he saw it covered up and it looked Edge sized, and I saw an article that calls it a compact CUV??
  2. The Rivian will be much more capable and larger than a Ridgeline.
  3. Motortrend wasn't very kind to the Explorer in their Explorer/Palisades comparo today either. I don't get it!!
  4. It does have a lot of cool features.....and I like how wide it is. I don't think I could ever buy one either, but I think a new fascia would make it look tons better!
  5. Which shows who the real fan boys are.....Ford truck owners will buy the best truck, Toyota owners will buy Yota no matter what.....which there is a lot of no matter what IMO.
  6. I'm sure they went a few inches longer since Chevy did. They don't need to be any bigger.
  7. I may have missed this in a discussion, but will the next Ranger probably debut after the Bronco?
  8. I'm sure Fields won't be so kind to Ford when he testifies.
  9. True.....and that is what I meant. I was speaking more of the Supercrew since that is what I have.....but driving dynamics are quite different between what I have now and the 05 I used to have. Tight parking or a parking deck means taking my wife's car if at all possible.....that's the part I don't like. Offering the Supercab with the 5.5' box again would be better.....but maybe to much to ask. I understand this way there are less combinations of materials needed.
  10. The Supercabs are identical in wheelbase and length as the Supercrews.
  11. I agree.....no way the Ranger is close to older F150, but the F150 has grown recently. The new truck is 8 inches longer in wheelbase and length than the 04-08 truck. To me, it negatively affects the drivability......but it looks like I'm in the minority on this. I do wish they would offer the SC with the 5'6" bed again......other than the Raptor.
  12. While not exactly a track time, the Model 3 matches the GT-350 on the MT figure 8 on time with a slightly better avg G......and weighing approximately 500 lbs more. I'm certainly not a Tesla fan boy, but Blue Oval all the way. I am impressed with what Tesla has accomplished to this point, even though I don't agree with the tax credits on EV's. However, I think that will bite Tesla now they they are running out of credits, and now all other manufacturers will have plenty of credits left. Even Henry Ford had struggles and failures when he started, but it didn't take long after he actually started FMC to become profitable........but at that point he was the only game in town too.
  13. I forgot about that......should do well. I certainly like it much better than the RAV4.
  14. The RAV4 is AWD though.......so Escape needs to beat it.
  15. I completely agree. While the F-150 has gotten bigger than I like, after looking at the Ranger it isn't an option. I'm sure the next Ranger will get a little bigger, but never enough to make it an option.......and there are plenty of people who look at it just the opposite......no way one truck will cover all bases.
  16. Just read an Autoblog article and it looks like the Escape is 2.4" longer and gained 3.5 cubic feet behind the second row......couldn't find anything on the width yet.
  17. Just curious, have any of the I4 Ecoboost engines added PFI yet?
  18. Loved the 04-08 model. Definitely the favorite of all of the trucks I have had. would be awesome with 18+ EB drive train.
  19. I was thinking about advertising from the Model T to the Model E.....ahhh maybe that's corny.
  20. I know....so why won't they use Model E.....instead of Mach E....or Mach 1
  21. That would be another $4205 without the sunroof that would be on the XLT. It's fine.....I'll be one of 5% in lost sales.....lol
  22. Just seems to me if they really want to hit at Tesla, they should just call it Model E!
×
×
  • Create New...