Jump to content

More details on 2009 Escape Hybrid system


battyr

Recommended Posts

I asked a relatively simple question (no such thing here!) and you are all still arguing 2 pages later!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Escape_Hybrid

 

The Escape Hybrid uses technology similar to that used in Toyota's Prius. Ford engineers realized their technology may conflict with patents held by Toyota, which led to a 2004 patent-sharing accord between the companies, licensing Ford's use of some of Toyota's hybrid technology in exchange for Toyota's use of some of Ford's diesel and direct-injection engine technology.[7] Both Ford and Toyota state that Ford received no technical assistance from Toyota in developing the hybrid powertrain, but that some hybrid engine technologies developed by Ford independently were found to be similar to technologies previously patented by Toyota.

 

Aisin Seiki Co. Ltd., a Japanese automotive components supplier belonging to the Toyota Group, supplies the hybrid continuously variable transmission for the Escape Hybrid. While Toyota produces its third-generation Prius transmission in-house, Aisin is the only supplier of hybrid transmissions to other manufacturers. Friction has arisen concerning Aisin's allocation of limited production capacity and engineering resources to Ford.[7]

 

Sounds like Ford needs to make it's own Hybrid transmissions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I asked a relatively simple question (no such thing here!) and you are all still arguing 2 pages later!

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Escape_Hybrid

 

 

 

 

 

Sounds like Ford needs to make it's own Hybrid transmissions?

 

I posted essentially this same information 11 posts after question and 36 posts later, here it is again.... :shades:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin,

 

Two people in this thread did say it was Ford's exclusive design. That is why I posted the window sticker. So how can you switch it around to say that no one ever said it was Ford's exclusive design? please clarify that.

 

Michael, I did provide the proof that she said the FEH has NO TOYOTA parts in it. I gave a link that QUOTES her! Doesn't that make her a liar for telling a straight lie?

 

again, you can keep defending Ford, if that makes you feel better.

 

I have provided the proof that the cvt is a japanese unit ( the window sticker)

 

I have provided the proof that Wright told a flat out lie... ( I included her article) again see the window sticker..

 

I am not the one claiming the FEH is "exclusively Fords design" YOU ARE!

 

What proof can you provide that it is?

 

I am DISAGREEING with your statement and showing what I can to help disprove what you said.

 

Other than patent talk and some "inside information", what have you provided?

 

Hey, it doesn't make me all that happy that the truck isn't 100% American made either, but enough with the denial already..

 

Can we agree that MAYBE they both or ok JUST FOrd designed it, but it IS in fact bought from AISIN (Toyota)?

 

Is that a close enough comprimise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because that's the truth.

 

PROGRESS!

 

If you read back in my post(s), all I ever claimed was that the unit was made by AISIN (Toyota) so the truck couldn't be exclusively Ford.

 

Can we agree that due to the fact that Wright was quoted saying that the FEH has NO Toyota technology OR PARTS in it, she in fact lied (because we just agreed that it had a Toyota PART in it?

Edited by 08FEH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PROGRESS!

 

If you read back in my post(s), all I ever claimed was that the unit was made by AISIN (Toyota) so the truck couldn't be exclusively Ford.

 

Can we agree that due to the fact that Wright was quoted saying that the FEH has NO Toyota technology OR PARTS in it, she in fact lied (because we just agreed that it had a Toyota PART in it?

Where do you think the US content comes from for Toyoda built in the US? All Toyoda does is ASSEMBLE here. Do you think they also import every piece on their vehicles?

 

You should RE-READ exactly what Mary Ann Wright said in your link. She did NOT LIE. For 25-35K transmissions, as others have tried to tell you here, NO ONE is going to open a parts plant to just make that gear. They will design it and have it made for them, even if only the Iranian's could do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin,

 

Two people in this thread did say it was Ford's exclusive design. That is why I posted the window sticker. So how can you switch it around to say that no one ever said it was Ford's exclusive design? please clarify that.

 

Michael, I did provide the proof that she said the FEH has NO TOYOTA parts in it. I gave a link that QUOTES her! Doesn't that make her a liar for telling a straight lie?

 

again, you can keep defending Ford, if that makes you feel better.

 

I have provided the proof that the cvt is a japanese unit ( the window sticker)

 

I have provided the proof that Wright told a flat out lie... ( I included her article) again see the window sticker..

 

I am not the one claiming the FEH is "exclusively Fords design" YOU ARE!

 

What proof can you provide that it is?

 

I am DISAGREEING with your statement and showing what I can to help disprove what you said.

 

Other than patent talk and some "inside information", what have you provided?

 

Hey, it doesn't make me all that happy that the truck isn't 100% American made either, but enough with the denial already..

 

Can we agree that MAYBE they both or ok JUST FOrd designed it, but it IS in fact bought from AISIN (Toyota)?

 

Is that a close enough comprimise?

 

I hate to sound all Bill Clintonish on this, but it depends on your definition of the word "design".

 

As I tried to point out earlier, if you say that any technology in the design of a component precludes the manufacturer from saying they designed the vehicle, then no single car or truck in the world would be said to be designed by the manufacturer. Not a Ford, nor a Toyota, nor any other product. They all use the technology that comes along with the components, and we are long past Henry Ford's total vertical integration where the manufacturer made all the components.

 

Some components are "black boxes" where the manufacturer specifies the package space, inputs/outputs, etc, and the supplier designs the device to accommodate the specs. If the component has some sort of leading, proprietary technology that gives the manufacturer the leg up in the marketplace, the supplier can expect to get a good profit margin. But normally the manufacturer will not discuss who designed the component, but take credit themselves for the overall design of the vehicle.

 

There are some exceptions. One I can think of is Ford's Sync system where Ford made a conscious decision to capitalize on Microsoft's brand name, use it in advertising, and apply a small plate to Sync equipped vehicles.

 

Yes, of course the transmission is bought from Aisin. I don't think Ford had any hand in designing the basic transmission; I think it's very close to the Prius design. Once again, you can't afford much uniqueness for only 20k volumes annually. There could have been some local mods to line up with the bolt pattern on the Ford/Mazda engine.

 

I believe the batteries are sourced from Asia as well. And, when the industry goes to Lithium Ion, those batteries will, in all likelihood, be manufactured in Korea or China and not the US. After all, who has been pushing them out by the billions in computers and other electronic equipment?

 

Mary Ann Wright's comments are fully reconcilable. From her perspective, Ford designed the Escape system without Toyota's technical assistance (in other words, there were no Toyota engineers consulted, and no technical services arrangement with Toyota). She is making the standard industry assumption that the umbrella term of "designing" includes the flexibility to put together components from various suppliers.

 

I will say, however, that her comments on Ford being shorted on supply are maybe carried a bit far, but I understand why she said it (she was trying to claw out more volume and maybe thought public embarrassment might work). The supply shortage is primarily Ford's fault for limiting the initial volume due to profitability concerns. And when demand picked up, the suppliers already had other better, higher-volume, more reliable customers lined up to take more than they could produce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PROGRESS!

 

If you read back in my post(s), all I ever claimed was that the unit was made by AISIN (Toyota) so the truck couldn't be exclusively Ford.

 

Can we agree that due to the fact that Wright was quoted saying that the FEH has NO Toyota technology OR PARTS in it, she in fact lied (because we just agreed that it had a Toyota PART in it?

 

 

so if one part of a vehicle isnt built exclusively by that manufacturer its no longer built exclusively by that manufacturer?

 

So all those non audi manufactured parts in my S4 means its not an Audi?

 

You must not have any idea how businesses are ran in this day and age....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PROGRESS!

 

If you read back in my post(s), all I ever claimed was that the unit was made by AISIN (Toyota) so the truck couldn't be exclusively Ford.

 

Can we agree that due to the fact that Wright was quoted saying that the FEH has NO Toyota technology OR PARTS in it, she in fact lied (because we just agreed that it had a Toyota PART in it?

 

I agree with Austin-you need to get laid and drink some beers. Why do you indirectly state that it is Aisin and then in the next post or sentence go on about it being Toyota? They do not own this company but do have an investment in them-not unlike many Japanese companies. I have to laugh because you are calling a respected engineer a liar because you have a parts content label.

 

Something tells me that you are very stubborn and pig headed-not sure why I would feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Austin-you need to get laid and drink some beers. Why do you indirectly state that it is Aisin and then in the next post or sentence go on about it being Toyota? They do not own this company but do have an investment in them-not unlike many Japanese companies. I have to laugh because you are calling a respected engineer a liar because you have a parts content label.

 

Something tells me that you are very stubborn and pig headed-not sure why I would feel that way.

 

Kyle, I wont resort to calling you childish names, but what exactly is your iq I am wondering.

 

It is funny how instead of offering anything useful to debate, you resort to telling me to have a beer... Is this how you cope with debate?

 

either way.. I'll make it REALLY basic for you...

 

Toyota OWNS AISIN along with another popular Japanese company.. I'm sorry if by not typing the two names together EVERY time, you got confused...

 

Toyota OWNS AISIN.... AISIN IS A TOYOTA COMPANY...

 

ok..

 

The Parts content label SAYS the transmission is supplied by a JAPANESE company (AISIN) (Which is OWNED BY TOYOTA)

 

The full of shit engineer was quoted saying... THERE IS NO TOYOTA TECHNOLOGY OR PARTS IN THE FORD ESCAPE HYBRID.

 

T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford To Buy Hybrid Engine Parts From Toyota Affiliate

 

Aisin AW Co., a manufacturer affiliated with Toyota Motor Corp., said it will develop hybrid gas and electric power systems for Ford Motor Co.

 

The preliminary agreement between Ford and Aisin AW Co. marks a change in strategy for Toyota, whose U.S. partner up to now has been General Motors Corp. It also emphasizes the growing need among the world's top automakers to develop new partnerships to keep up with cost-cutting pressures and technological advances.

 

Aisin AW plans to supply Ford with electric motors for use in 10,000 to 20,000 gas-electric hybrid vehicles a year beginning in 2003, according to an Aisin AW spokesman, Hirotake Kondo. Mr. Kondo said that a final contract hasn't been signed. Aisin AW is a subsidiary of Aisin Seiki Co., a major auto-parts maker.

 

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UD..._14/ai_74992521

Edited by Critic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle, I wont resort to calling you childish names, but what exactly is your iq I am wondering.

 

It is funny how instead of offering anything useful to debate, you resort to telling me to have a beer... Is this how you cope with debate?

 

either way.. I'll make it REALLY basic for you...

 

Toyota OWNS AISIN along with another popular Japanese company.. I'm sorry if by not typing the two names together EVERY time, you got confused...

 

Toyota OWNS AISIN.... AISIN IS A TOYOTA COMPANY...

 

ok..

 

The Parts content label SAYS the transmission is supplied by a JAPANESE company (AISIN) (Which is OWNED BY TOYOTA)

 

The full of shit engineer was quoted saying... THERE IS NO TOYOTA TECHNOLOGY OR PARTS IN THE FORD ESCAPE HYBRID.

 

T

 

You can't seem to separate that fact that just because it's manufactured by Aisin that it might not have Toyota technology in the design. Can you grasp the concept of "built to spec"? Ever consider the possibility that Ford spec'd the transmission and had Aisin build it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford To Buy Hybrid Engine Parts From Toyota Affiliate

 

Aisin AW Co., a manufacturer affiliated with Toyota Motor Corp., said it will develop hybrid gas and electric power systems for Ford Motor Co.

 

The preliminary agreement between Ford and Aisin AW Co. marks a change in strategy for Toyota, whose U.S. partner up to now has been General Motors Corp. It also emphasizes the growing need among the world's top automakers to develop new partnerships to keep up with cost-cutting pressures and technological advances.

 

Aisin AW plans to supply Ford with electric motors for use in 10,000 to 20,000 gas-electric hybrid vehicles a year beginning in 2003, according to an Aisin AW spokesman, Hirotake Kondo. Mr. Kondo said that a final contract hasn't been signed. Aisin AW is a subsidiary of Aisin Seiki Co., a major auto-parts maker.

 

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UD..._14/ai_74992521

 

Here's an interesting quote from that article:

 

However, Aisin AW doesn't currently supply hybrid motors for Toyota or other auto makers and said it is now developing the motor it plans to supply to Ford. It wasn't clear whether Toyota will share its hybrid know-how with Aisin, or whether the new Aisin motor would be used in Toyota vehicles.

 

Sounds to me like the tech developed for Ford is different than what Toyota uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do you think the US content comes from for Toyoda built in the US? All Toyoda does is ASSEMBLE here. Do you think they also import every piece on their vehicles?

 

You should RE-READ exactly what Mary Ann Wright said in your link. She did NOT LIE. For 25-35K transmissions, as others have tried to tell you here, NO ONE is going to open a parts plant to just make that gear. They will design it and have it made for them, even if only the Iranian's could do it.

 

 

Do you see where it says no Toyota technology or parts in it?

 

I am not arguing that the Aisin unit was a bad choice..

 

It is a Toyota part in the FEH, she said there were no Toyota parts in the FEH..

 

It is that simple.. she lied...

 

I could care less WHY they did it... just don't LIE to the public about it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you see where it says no Toyota technology or parts in it?

 

I am not arguing that the Aisin unit was a bad choice..

 

It is a Toyota part in the FEH, she said there were no Toyota parts in the FEH..

 

It is that simple.. she lied...

 

I could care less WHY they did it... just don't LIE to the public about it!

 

How about this:

 

For their part, Toyota officials say they have not held back on any hybrid parts to other companies. A Toyota spokesman, Paul Nolasco, said it was not interfering in Ford's relationship with Aisin, which is a major supplier to Toyota. Toyota sells hybrid components to Nissan, but not to Ford.

 

:reading:

 

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it was Toyota technology, just a Toyota part...which she said the truck had none of..

 

I am done.

 

You remind me of sheep, following everything they hear..

 

Do some research folks, don't believe everything you hear just because it comes from an engineer..

 

 

There really isn't anything else I can type...

 

Enjoy what you all think is Ford's exclusive design, full of your Ford only parts, maybe Alice will visit you all from Wonderland too!

 

Peace out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it was Toyota technology, just a Toyota part

 

No, it's a Ford part manufactured by Aisin, which is partially owned by Toyota. Toyota doesn't use that transmission in any of its hybrid. It's a simple concept you can't seem to grasp.

Edited by TomServo92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it even make a difference to you FEH if Mullany called to tell you otherwise? It doesn't matter what gets dragged up in here, your not going to believe it. :banghead:

 

She wasn't just an engineer, She didn't lie.

 

BTW Toyoda owns about 41% of Aisin, Ford owns 31% of Mazda. Daimler owns 10% of Chrysler, Nissan owns what of Renault?, etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it was Toyota technology, just a Toyota part...which she said the truck had none of..

 

I am done.

 

You remind me of sheep, following everything they hear..

 

Do some research folks, don't believe everything you hear just because it comes from an engineer..

 

 

There really isn't anything else I can type...

 

Enjoy what you all think is Ford's exclusive design, full of your Ford only parts, maybe Alice will visit you all from Wonderland too!

 

Peace out.

 

Fine where's your documentation that proves otherwsie?

 

Where?

 

Where?

 

Your posting here has been contradictory from the start, and quite frankly it is annoying. Document your information know it all. Otherwise shut up.

Edited by Michael Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said it was Toyota technology, just a Toyota part...which she said the truck had none of..

 

I am done.

 

You remind me of sheep, following everything they hear..

 

Do some research folks, don't believe everything you hear just because it comes from an engineer..

 

 

There really isn't anything else I can type...

 

Enjoy what you all think is Ford's exclusive design, full of your Ford only parts, maybe Alice will visit you all from Wonderland too!

 

Peace out.

 

Peace out and take a chill pill!

Just because you type drivel doesn't make it true.

Geez, have you heard of Getrag? Ford and many others are affiliated with Getrag.

http://www.discoverhybridcars.com/?s=getrag

Powershift. Also in early 2008, Volvo Cars will introduce a version of the new Getrag-Ford dual-clutch automated manual transmission, demonstrated at the 2006 Frankfurt International Motor Show.

Getrag-Ford Transmissions is a 50:50 joint venture between Getrag and Ford.

 

It is neither a Toyota "part" as it's not used in their cars, nor is it Toyota "technology" for the same reason.

 

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EI...t_3/ai_19650941

General Motors' Allison Transmission and Aisin Seiki Form Joint Venture to Market Automatic Transmissions in Japan and Asia

Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd., founded in 1949, has grown into a leading international supplier of sophisticated automotive components. AISIN is known for its visionary approach, innovative, high quality products manufactured using the basic principle of "Quality First." ASIN provides its worldwide customers a broad range of engine, body, drivetrain and other vehicle products through its overseas network of production and sales subsidiaries.

 

And they have been used in Chrysler products too:

http://www.drivetrain.com/aisinwarerAX4_AX5_AX15.html

 

 

http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0.../A01-272872.htm

"Aisin, which is minority-controlled by Toyota, has interesting shareholders they have to answer to," said Mary Ann Wright, director of Ford's hybrid programs research and advanced engineering.

 

"They have recently been awarded a significant piece of business, and what that has done is limit the number of engineers who can work on my program," Wright said.

 

For its future hybrids, Ford is scouting for domestic suppliers to reduce its reliance on Japanese firms whose first loyalties may lie elsewhere.

 

 

I'm thinking Toyota didn't stay with Aisin because they didn't have the capacity they needed. Ford needs to switch also. Could Toyota (because of it's interest in Aisin) be limiting transmission availability to Ford? Possibly, but I don't know. Maybe Getrag didn't have an available tranny at the time.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you see where it says no Toyota technology or parts in it?

 

I am not arguing that the Aisin unit was a bad choice..

 

It is a Toyota part in the FEH, she said there were no Toyota parts in the FEH..

 

It is that simple.. she lied...

 

I could care less WHY they did it... just don't LIE to the public about it!

 

No she didn't lie.

You seem to have an aversion to the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...