Jump to content

Ford at Frankfort Auto Show


Recommended Posts

Posted Yesterday, 10:27 PM

Green Car Congress / September 14, 2015

 

Ford will be introducing the Euro-spec version of its Edge SUV at the IAA in Frankfurt this week. The large SUV will be offered in Europe with a choice of 180 PS (177.5 hp) 2.0-liter TDCi diesel engine with six-speed manual transmission, or 210 PS (207.1 hp) bi-turbo 2.0‑liter TDCi diesel with six-speed PowerShift automatic transmission. Ford said both powertrains will deliver up to 40.6 mpg US (5.8 l/100 km) fuel efficiency and 149g/km CO2 supported by Auto-Start-Stop technology.

 

The upscale Edge will join the Ford Kuga (U.S. market Escape) SUV and EcoSport compact SUV to meet the demands of growing numbers of SUV customers in Europe. Ford expects to sell 200,000 SUVs in Europe in 2016—a 200% increase compared to 2013. (Earlier post.)

 

Edge also will feature Ford’s Intelligent All-Wheel Drive (AWD) technology as standard, delivering a seamless transition between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive performance to provide a more secure footing on the road especially in slippery conditions.

 

Measuring how the car’s wheels are gripping the road surface every 16 milliseconds, the system can send up to 100% of engine torque to the front or rear wheels. By only delivering torque where and when it is needed, Intelligent AWD has minimal impact on fuel-efficiency and CO2 emissions compared with permanent four-wheel drive systems.

 

Edge and the new Ford Ranger pickup, also being introduced at Frankfurt, are among eight Ford models offered with AWD or four-wheel drive, including the all-new Focus RS, Galaxy, S-MAX, Mondeo and Mondeo Vignale.

 

All-new Edge will offer new Ford technologies, including Adaptive Steering, which automatically optimizes the steering response according to vehicle speed, making it easy to maneuver at low speeds, while remaining precise and intuitive at higher speeds; and Front Split View Camera, which makes restricted visibility junctions or parking spaces easier to negotiate.

 

Edge will introduce segment-first Pre-Collision Assist with Pedestrian Detection; a camera- and radar-based system that operates at speeds from 5mph to over 100mph to detect vehicles and people in the road ahead. The system can automatically apply the brakes if a potential collision is detected and the driver does not respond to warnings. Ford anticipates a five-star safety rating from independent crash test authority Euro NCAP.

 

Acoustic windscreen glass and laminated glass for the driver and front passenger door windows help minimize noise in the cabin. Underbody panels and wheel well liners further minimize road and wind noise. All Edge models (except Zetec in UK) are also equipped with Ford’s Active Noise Control technology that detects unwanted engine noise in the cabin and cancels it out with opposing sound waves that are fed through the car’s sound system.

 

Ranger

 

The current Ford Ranger has generated rapid sales growth in Europe since first being introduced in late 2011. Total sales of 21,600 vehicles in 2014 in Ford’s 20 traditional European markets were more than double those achieved in 2012, while 16,700 Rangers were sold in the first eight months of 2015—a further 36% increase year-over-year. Ranger won the prestigious “International Pickup Award 2013” title, and the new model will be challenging for the 2016 award at the competition next month.

 

New Ranger offers improved fuel economy, with a more efficient powertrain range—enhanced by Auto-Start-Stop technology, new final drive ratio options and the introduction of Electric Power Assisted Steering—delivering reductions in fuel consumption of up to 17%.

 

The improved diesel line-up features 130 PS (128.2 hp) and 160 PS (157.8 hp) variants of Ford’s latest 2.2-liter TDCi engine—delivering increased output compared to the 125 PS and 150 PS engines in the outgoing model—and the 200 PS (197.3 hp) five-cylinder 3.2-liter TDCi unit.

 

Both six-speed manual and automatic transmissions are available, and customers can select four-wheel drive and two-wheel drive variants. Wildtrak models feature four-wheel drive as standard.

 

All new Ranger variants achieve significantly improved fuel efficiency, with the 160 PS model offering exceptional figures of 6.5 l/100 km (36.2 mpg US) and 171 g/km CO2 emissions for reduced running costs—compared with 7.8 l/100 km (30.2 mpg US) and 206 g/km CO2 in the outgoing model.

 

An electronically controlled transfer case allows drivers in four-wheel drive models to shift on the fly from two- to four-wheel drive high-range with a knob on the center console. For low- speed torque or additional downhill braking in challenging terrain, drivers also can engage low- range four-wheel drive gearing. An electronic locking rear differential also helps to improve traction in difficult conditions. These off-road strengths are matched by towing capability of up to 3,500 kg and payload capacity.

 

An array of driver assistance technologies deliver greater comfort and convenience, including Lane Keeping Alert and Lane Keeping Aid, Adaptive Cruise Control with Forward Alert, Front and Rear Park Assist, Rear View Camera, and a standard Electronic Stability Control system with rollover mitigation and trailer sway control.

 

Other smart technologies include:

 

  • Hill Launch Assist, which helps drivers confidently start off from a slope, whether in forward or reverse;

  • Hill Descent Control, which uses the traction control system to help when descending steep slopes at a constant speed;

  • Adaptive Load Control, which adjusts the Electronic Stability Control system based on vehicle load; and

  • Emergency Brake Assistance, which provides additional pressure to the brake system to increase braking force when the driver applies the brakes quickly in an emergency situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Focus RS embargo broken: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2016-ford-focus-rs-0-62mph-47sec-165mph-and-%C2%A328940

 

345hp matches the previous generation limited edition Focus RS500.

 

So the new RS500 should be bumping up against 400hp in 2 years time.

 

Power from the 2.3-litre four-pot Ecoboost engine is 345bhp at 5900rpm, with a redline of 6800rpm. Maximum torque of 324lb ft is delivered between 2000 and 4500rpm, but there's an overboost function delivering up to 346lb ft for up to 15 seconds.
Edited by bzcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Focus RS embargo broken: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2016-ford-focus-rs-0-62mph-47sec-165mph-and-%C2%A328940

 

345hp matches the previous generation limited edition Focus RS500.

 

So the new RS500 should be bumping up against 400hp in 2 years time.

 

 

6800RPM redline for the 2.3L EB--just crazy to think that the 5.2L V8 FPC revs up to 8200.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tenneco Introduces New Adaptive Damping Technology on the Ford Focus RS High Performance Road Car

Ford Motor Company chooses Tenneco’s Dual Mode system to deliver drivers the choice between sport and track suspensions

 

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150916005155/en/Tenneco-Introduces-Adaptive-Damping-Technology-Ford-Focus#.VfksMt9Vikp

 

 

GKN supplies innovative AWD system to Ford Focus RS
GKN Automotive, the global leader in driveline technologies, has developed a new version of its Twinster torque vectoring all-wheel drive (AWD) system for the Ford Focus RS. An innovative combination of new gearing ratios and control algorithms over-speed the rear wheels, helping Ford to create a car with unprecedented dynamics, feel and handling.

GKN Driveline Media Centre : GKN supplies innovative AWD system to Ford Focus RS
Edited by MKII
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ and that is precisely the reason why I don't believe the Focus RS drivetrain will be used across the entire lineup. Pieces of it I can see, but not as-is

 

they will be sharing between AWD on the RS and other C platform models.

 

The Architecture is a tool box of Components, The ST's IRS module is similar to the that on the Escape, and in fact he changes made to the ST vs the base focus Allow Space for half-shafts, and possibly a Rear differential.

 

I cannot Foresee The RS differential being used on pedestrian models but agian the the AWD-IRS module, half-shafts, CV joints, driveshaft, and PTU could and should be used on other models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6800RPM redline for the 2.3L EB--just crazy to think that the 5.2L V8 FPC revs up to 8200.

 

8200RPM is crazy impressive from a production especially one that large.

 

Turbo places more Stress on engine internals, you simply cannot have Turbo and higher RPMs without alot of work on the internals, it diffinaly doesn't help that the Stoke is so long on the 2.3 92mmX 87.5mm Stoke to bore.

 

the 2.3 pumps 150HP per liter in the RS

 

while the 5.2 produces 101hp per liter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

they will be sharing between AWD on the RS and other C platform models.

 

The Architecture is a tool box of Components, The ST's IRS module is similar to the that on the Escape, and in fact he changes made to the ST vs the base focus Allow Space for half-shafts, and possibly a Rear differential.

 

I cannot Foresee The RS differential being used on pedestrian models but agian the the AWD-IRS module, half-shafts, CV joints, driveshaft, and PTU could and should be used on other models.

You kinda contradicted yourself there

 

I agree with you on your last point though. Use parts of it that make sense in whatever application they're looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You kinda contradicted yourself there

 

I agree with you on your last point though. Use parts of it that make sense in whatever application they're looking at.

 

You think so?

 

hmm...

 

If you consider that what makes the RS AWd system Special is the Differential and everything else isn't entirely different than what is being used on the Escape or Fusion, why would you develop 100% new parts if it is only that single part that makes this Vehicle sporty?

 

To put it another way what sense does it make to redesign every part of an entire AWD system to accommodate a different Differential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You think so?

 

hmm...

 

If you consider that what makes the RS AWd system Special is the Differential and everything else isn't entirely different than what is being used on the Escape or Fusion, why would you develop 100% new parts if it is only that single part that makes this Vehicle sporty?

 

To put it another way what sense does it make to redesign every part of an entire AWD system to accommodate a different Differential.

That's the thing, maybe they don't have to redesign it to accommodate a different differential. Not much is known publicly about it other than press releases. If this system is the basis of Ford's AWD systems moving forward, there would have to be built in flexibility to be able to use it in multiple applications

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the thing, maybe they don't have to redesign it to accommodate a different differential. Not much is known publicly about it other than press releases. If this system is the basis of Ford's AWD systems moving forward, there would have to be built in flexibility to be able to use it in multiple applications

 

Think about it this way, the platforms themselves dictate alot of what is possible in a AWD system.

 

Once you Determine those parameters you design parts to accommodate them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would expect that the prop shaft & half-shafts are different on the RS than they would be on any non-performance AWD product.

 

I don't think there's any meaningful savings for C-segment AWD that would come from sharing RS driveline components, except maybe the PTU.

 

The quotidian AWD vehicles will more than pay for their own AWD components, they don't need the RS volume for justification, and conversely, given the upcharge for the RS, the RS doesn't need quotidian volume to make its own AWD components affordable.

Edited by RichardJensen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would expect that the prop shaft & half-shafts are different on the RS than they would be on any non-performance AWD product.

 

I don't think there's any meaningful savings for C-segment AWD that would come from sharing RS driveline components, except maybe the PTU.

 

The quotidian AWD vehicles will more than pay for their own AWD components, they don't need the RS volume for justification, and conversely, given the upcharge for the RS, the RS doesn't need quotidian volume to make its own AWD components affordable.

I'm not saying either of you are necessarily wrong, I'm just saying that if the opportunity is there to share components and save some money, why wouldn't you?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...