Jump to content

CurtisH

Member
  • Content Count

    631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About CurtisH

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

819 profile views
  1. The 2.3 only has 310 hp in the Mustang. The Ranger only has 270, right? So, the 2.7 would provide significantly more hp. Akirby has already mentioned the torque difference.
  2. I haven’t counted lately. It’s between 12 and 17 right now, all Fords.
  3. My brother’s company is small. He usually keeps a couple of spare vehicles to cover “down time” for the primary vehicles. Of course, the spares are the older vehicles. I’m sure the dynamics of a large fleet are different.
  4. I guess it depends on the size of the fleet or company. My brother’s fleet has the following types of vehicles: E150 F150 F250 Ranger (old model) Transit Connect He’s keeps every vehicle for over 200,000 miles.
  5. CurtisH

    news coming....

    I agree. I think they made a good compromise with the front.
  6. I believe the front suspension was substantially revamped too. I remember an article saying that the IRS worked so well that they had to significantly update the front suspension so it worked as well as the IRS. The hard points were mostly (maybe completely) unchanged.
  7. CurtisH

    Mach 1 revealed.

    There wasn’t really a bump. The Bullitt already has 480 hp.
  8. In Normal mode, my Mustang skips 2nd and 4th gears. In Sport+, it doesn’t skip gears. I believe Akirby has mentioned that his F150 also skips 2nd and 4th in most instances.
  9. The 10R80 in my Ecoboost Mustang is very smooth in Normal Mode. The 10R80 in my Ecoboost Mustang is very smooth in Normal Mode. The shifts are much more noticeable in Sport+ mode or when the transmission is in Sport instead of Drive, as they should be. FYI: I spend about half the time in Sport+ mode.
  10. CurtisH

    Hyundai Santa Fe teased

    I don’t like that front end.
  11. I’m apparently a little slow here. It’s probably obvious, but what’s missing?
  12. I’d like to know that, but haven’t found anything official regarding how they count/classify the deaths.
  13. Gotcha. I thought it addressed some of the data items you mentioned in an earlier message, but knew it didn’t cover everything you wanted. It is better than it was a month or two ago. Maybe they’ll add some more details to the data.
  14. Quite a bit of information is here: GA Dept of Public Health May not have everything you’re looking for.
  15. I understand what you are saying, but it was a moderator. And it was in the Bronco Sport section, which is subtitled “The latest news on the Bronco Sport”. It is kind of funny. 😄
×