tbone

I used to work in IT before switching to my current job so I understand where you coming from. I personally don’t mind change, but like many, I don’t like change for change’s sake. We recently upgraded to Windows 11, and the start button moved to the center of the screen from the left side, more like an Apple product. That small change drummed up a lot of debate lol, but to me that is a change for change’s sake. If I wanted an Apple interface, I would buy an Apple. Fortunately for most, you could change it back to the traditional view, with Click, but if you are coming from the Apple ecosystem perhaps you would like that.

I drive the MME every week. I’m telling you it’s the range. It’s a very nice car otherwise and if it had a gas engine, they would be selling the crap out of it.

I understand your concerns and they’re valid. There is a serious amount of uncertainty in the BEV market. Is anyone asking if BEVs are the right solution to decrease emissions? I’m not pretending to suggest there is a better alternative yet, just wondering really. Ultimately these two Ford vehicles, which are nicely appointed attractive vehicles, are not selling due to perceived, or real range deficiencies, and perhaps some cost issues. . Unless there is some miraculous change in battery technology in the VERY near future, I don’t see how the situation improves.

I’ve been absorbing this refresh for a while now, and as a current ST owner, I just don’t know what to think. First Ford jacked up my new car purchase rotation by delaying this refresh over a year, but that’s another story. The interior updates are great, but much to my chagrin, and many others, they eliminated the physical buttons for basic functions. We used these controls enough that it’s annoying, and I just don’t like the feel of touchscreens for these functions. It’s not just set it and forget it in our car, even though it automated climate control. The rear of the Explorer is a major improvement. That was probably my least favorite thing about the prior model, as it was very bland looking. Now as for the front end, I personally loved the prior models arrangement, contrary to some on here, and I’m just not sure what to think of the new grill. I thought the outgoing grill blended nicely with the lines of the rest of the vehicle. This new grill looks blobby and I feel it doesn’t blend with the rest of the lines well based on the pics. I’ll have to reserve judgement until I see it in person. It is disappointing there were no powertrain changes but not surprising really. I just don’t know why they don’t add 15 to 20 hp on these refreshes, when it is pretty easy for them to do, so they can use it as a marketing tool. I was really hoping for MagneRide suspension on the ST, at least as an option. I think that would have been an excellent upgrade to the ST. I despise the the wheels on the ST. They look like something you would find on an XLT, instead of a performance vehicle. On top of it, I did the build and price on the ST and it is only showing Magnatite-Painted Aluminum Wheels, whereas the literature shows black. This must be an oversight as they certainly will need black for this model. With these ugly wheels, they need to have a wheel option with a style more consistent with the current model. I like the painted roof option but it’s pricey. I also think the molding on the platinum model needs to be painted body color to be consistent with a more upscale vehicle. Ultimately, I really need to see this vehicle in person to get a better idea how I feel about it.

I’d be very surprised if there is an increase in the dimensions. It’s my understanding they are using the same structure. Hopefully we will know more details soon.

I don’t care about the name. It’s just nice they offer a two row version.

Makes sense. I like it. Definitely a fan of Mazda’s recent styling.

Totally agree.

I have to say I was pleasantly surprised by this 2023 Edge SEL AWD I was recently assigned. Prior to receiving it I was disappointed about it because the other Edges we have had really felt spartan inside, mostly because of the very generic looking center stack. They apparently dropped that design (thankfully) and replaced it with 12” screen, which is a significant upgrade IMO, giving it a more modern feel inside. Now granted the car hasn’t been updated in a while, but I think the interior materials are good, fit and finish has been good, and doesn’t seem completely decontented, although I don’t have proper perspective to know how true that last statement is. My only major complaint right now is the front edge of the drivers seat is too high, causing it to put unwanted pressure on the back of my thighs. I have not been enjoying that on my longer trips. I thought the SEL was supposed to have an 8 way seat, but this feels like 6. I was wondering if this was because it is a fleet model but I haven’t confirmed yet. It’s really a shame they did not update this model. All it needed was new sheet metal and an updated interior. It could have soldiered on with this frame and a few powertrain updates.

As someone who who is using both at edge and an MME, I will agree that the Evos is likely not a direct replacement. The edge definitely has a more upright stance to it and a higher seating position, but I do think it would pick up a few edge buyers. As you previously stated, I think a C2 edge would likely be the most effective replacement for that vehicle. They have the Chinese edge that they could use, however, I believe that would need some aesthetic tweaks to be successful here.

I guess my statement had more to do with not specifically building products that people wanted. It’s pretty clear they misjudged the transition to BEV, and now have a questionable product mix, IMO. I don’t personally see how they will be able to support four BEVs for the foreseeable future at that plant. It seems they will have a lot of excess capacity now for something that isn’t in demand. I can tell you right now that real world of battery usage for the MME in normal operation is not consistent with stated ranges, and people have been learning that. During the last cold snap, the MME couldn’t handle what I would consider to be a pretty common drive in my area, which would have resulted in me having to stop to charge on the way home. So instead, I had to use my Edge that day for that commute. It’s primarily the cold weather range that just sucks. ultimately, I would hate to be a manufacturer trying to navigate this transition. The target will be constantly moving.

Been asking the same question for a while. Ford really doesn’t have that many products to sell and this would be a very complimentary. Makes no senses. I agree with you and I think it would sell here. I don’t think it’s too late for it if they really wanted to.

Like I said, seems like poor planning by Ford to have such a long downtime, and likely replacing existing products with products that have lower demand. Just seems like an unforced error, and it sucks that you will lose 30% of your pay.

To me it doesn’t matter if they are EVs or not, but a couple of additional models to sell would be helpful. Yep, poor product planning as far as I’m concerned. Now that production will be ending, what happens to you all of you workers? Do you go on unemployment? Does the union supplement the loss of income associated with unemployment, or does Ford? How does this work?

The problem with Mitsubishi’s design is its handle bar mustache look with lights all over the place. IMO it’s horrible design work, and again, why can’t Mitsubishi just go away.

I know, I was being facetious.

We are going to find out in pretty short order. They have me a little worried though.

That is not a compliment!

I get it when the brands are completely combined at a dealership and you are trying to create a brand separation, identity, and experience, but it’s hard to understand context when you don’t know anything about the dealerships in question. But I don’t understand trying to shutter dealerships in smaller areas where you effectively restrict access to your product because of geographic location. Nobody wants to work with a dealership that is two hours away. Hard to sell products you don’t have. A medium sized Lincoln dealership near me rarely had any Lincoln stock this past year. It doesn’t help there are only four products to sell, one of which was going to be discontinued, and two that are pretty long in the tooth. Doesn’t necessarily create an ideal sales environment.

It sure feels like Lincoln is being poorly managed again, which is holding it back. I sure hope they don’t allow the positive product/sales momentum they have experienced to be ruined by stale products and lack of models and commitment.

I can’t disagree with them. Not a fan of the styling. It seems to be trying to be different just for the sake of being different.

It was a Motor1 article. I misspoke and should have read it more clearly. The CT 5 was actually their global sales leader, primarily because of China, not the leader in the US.

Weird behavior.

It’s too bad they didn’t have a hybrid version of the MME, as I think it would sell quite well. I’ve had quite a few compliments on my MME regarding its style, more so than the fact it’s a BEV. It is a nice vehicle, aside from its range limitations, which could have been solved by a hybrid powertrain.

I think this is a good looking Caddy. A friend of mine just bought a non V model and seems to like it. I read recently it is their best selling vehicle, which I found interesting.