Jump to content

How the Flex will be a success


elkarlo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guess your not that old...if you look at Ford in the 1980's they had 'frog" nose on most of the car...no grill with a blue oval in the middle of it...the 1986 Taurus is the best example of this.

 

Then look at the 1990's...the Contour, Escort and Taurus all shared the free floating blue oval grill

 

The problem is that after 2000, Ford didn't have any real design direction till the Fusion came out, thus why we are seeing the Razor grill on everything.

 

Lets not even get started on BMW or Pontiac...all their cars share the same grill design.

 

Its all about brand recognition

 

I think at the moment, BMW pulls off the corporate grille the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...you chose optimism over being realistic eh?

 

Optimism over being realistic?

 

I hope you're joking.

 

Look at GM's Sky/Solstice. IIRC, I read an article somewhere saying they're having trouble unloading them now that initial demand has been filled.

 

So, based on that fact, how do you think a 2 seat Ford roadster would do in the long run? IMO, not too well as a consistent seller, at least not as well as a Flex could do. With Flex, you know that there's always going to be somebody who will need that vehicle a vehicle you can pile tons of stuff, people, whatever into, while still being fuel efficient and stylish (yes, I like it). With a small roadster, there's not necessarily always going to be a market for that type of vehicle, I know you're going to argue about the Miata, but that is an established, proven model that has it's own following already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the vehicle that started the fad is much more rounded now and the boxes from Chrysler...aren't selling.

Oh. So your basis is the performance of vehicles that cost 1/2 to 2/3rds of the price of the Flex, which do not seat 6 or 7 passengers, and which, in the instance of the Scion, is aimed at the children of the Flex' target audience.

 

Wow. Somebody needs to put you in charge of market research. That market analysis is completely unassailable.

 

Except, of course, the part where you said why the Flex wouldn't sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one potential customer for the Flex...Circuit City (assuming the don't go chapter11). You can haul a lot more crap in a Flex than a xB.

Yeah. The Flex is just a big xB.

 

I mean, a vehicle capable of hauling 7 people shouldn't look like a big box. Ford should really just do the Honda/Chrysler/Toyota thing and pretend that you can make a great big box look like something other than a great big box. Oh wait, minivan sales are falling? What? How can that be? They don't look like Scion xBs, but can haul 7 people; by the "Scion xB is a fad" line of reasoning, people that need to haul 6 other people should be lining up to buy a vehicle that can haul 7 people and which doesn't look like a Scion xB.

 

After all your choices are pretty much dust buster or Scion xB. Since the Scion xB look is -so played- then the dust buster look should still be going strong.

 

 

 

 

 

But it isn't is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I am not joking. I don't think there is a market for an expensive station wagon...a boxy one at that...right now.

 

 

Really? Seems to me that boxy station wagons have been selling in the millions for several years. You just slap on a cutesy marketing name like SUV and they become palatable. After all, isn't that what an SUV is?

 

Now that SUVs are making way for CUVs, lets call those station wagons by that name. ASfter all, isn't that what CUVs are?

 

And the boxy look is just a different approach. Maybe some are sick of jelly beans.

 

 

No the Flex won't be a million unit vehicle, but 100k units may be quite reasonable.

 

Cavernous interior. Potent engine and tranny. AWD. It has the makings of a great vehicle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It absolutely would...despite it's looks.

oh....so based on powertrains you now jump the fence? sheesh P....but then youd bitch about a $42000 window on a 2wd version......Front Wheel Drive no less....you have progressed to something stronger than alcohol.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh....so based on powertrains you now jump the fence? sheesh P....but then youd bitch about a $42000 window on a 2wd version......Front Wheel Drive no less....you have progressed to something stronger than alcohol.....

Well, the price is too much, but if you can get 30MPG out of the box...then it will sell. But if it had the 3.5 in it...good luck. My guess is that it will get about the same mileage as the Edge...which isn't that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the price is too much, but if you can get 30MPG out of the box...then it will sell. But if it had the 3.5 in it...good luck. My guess is that it will get about the same mileage as the Edge...which isn't that good.

just best in class thats all......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...