silvrsvt Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Mr. Stupidity at his best And making it .01 faster then the out going model would make it magically better? Really?? That small of a difference boils down to possible driver error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Slower than 4.3 Sec to 60.... At this point I was expecting 3.9-4.1 in this generation but I guess weight was the culprit. Interesting how my LS was a "cow" years ago at 3596 lbs, and now a Mustang is 3800+lbs is the grand heffer. Although at $45K I'm expecting quite a bit of aluminum panels around the vehicle to help with weight a bit, but that hasn't stopped Camaro from outselling the Mustang either. But sales should be better since it'll be more international so it's all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanatWork Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 To the slow croud, it should not even be that close in performance, from an all new mustang. Give or take a tenth, does anyone here with common sense think the new mustang, should be just as fast as an out dated camaro? There's always...wait for it...the idea to wait for an actual comparison test, instead of fixating one one ESTIMATED statistic in preview tests. Y'know, actual comparison rather than whining about theoreticals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mettech Posted September 18, 2014 Author Share Posted September 18, 2014 http://www.caranddriver.com/dodge/challenger-srt "In our testing, we hit 60 mph in 3.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11.7 seconds.." Common sense is not the logic for buying a muscle car.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 And making it .01 faster then the out going model would make it magically better? Really?? That small of a difference boils down to possible driver error.should it really be that close? If the new stang did 0-60 in something like 4.2, and the 1/4 mile in 12.5, you could say man, that's a nice improvement. If someone else comes along and get a new stang to do it in 12.6, isn't that what the camaro is doing?in this day, perception means alot to car people that's really into mustang vs camaro vs challenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 There's always...wait for it...the idea to wait for an actual comparison test, instead of fixating one one ESTIMATED statistic in preview tests. Y'know, actual comparison rather than whining about theoreticals? your the only one crying here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 should it really be that close? If the new stang did 0-60 in something like 4.2, and the 1/4 mile in 12.5, you could say man, that's a nice improvement. If someone else comes along and get a new stang to do it in 12.6, isn't that what the camaro is doing?in this day, perception means alot to car people that's really into mustang vs camaro vs challenger. What difference does it make to the 99.99999999% of mustang owners who don't drag race their mustangs? You only care about it so you can go brag to the "crapmaro" fans about how much better the mustang is now. Do you actually wear a fire suit and helmet when you're doing all that bench racing? How fast is fast enough? If the old one did 0-60 in 2 seconds does the new one have to do 1.8? Why are you totally ignoring any of the other improvements? Oh wait - handling isn't on the bench racing agenda, is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 your the only one crying here You're And he isn't crying - you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanatWork Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 I KNEW I'd gone a little big on the words.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 You're And he isn't crying - you are. just like chevy, your stupidity runs deep. I know about the better handling, and pulling a higher g than the Boss 302.i was talking about two thing on here. Learn to read Mr . stupidity and stop with your stupidness, you look like the fool that you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanatWork Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 just like chevy, your stupidity runs deep. I know about the better handling, and pulling a higher g than the Boss 302.i was talking about two thing on here. Learn to read Mr . stupidity and stop with your stupidness, you look like the fool that you are. Wow. "Stupidness"?!? That's kinda all anyone needs to see in this exchange. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 just like chevy, your stupidity runs deep. I know about the better handling, and pulling a higher g than the Boss 302.i was talking about two thing on here. Learn to read Mr . stupidity and stop with your stupidness, you look like the fool that you are. It's almost time for the Wah-mbulance...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHV 16V Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 (edited) just like chevy, your stupidity runs deep. I know about the better handling, and pulling a higher g than the Boss 302.i was talking about two thing on here. Learn to read Mr . stupidity and stop with your stupidness, you look like the fool that you are.Dude, what's up with the personal attacks/name calling? Not cool. If someone has a different viewpoint than you, then these forums are more than open to debate, as long as it's done in an adult manner. (Using adult vocabulary while you're at it....) Edited September 18, 2014 by OHV 16V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardJensen Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 http://www.caranddriver.com/dodge/challenger-srt "In our testing, we hit 60 mph in 3.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11.7 seconds.." Common sense is not the logic for buying a muscle car.. So, you're comparing the SRT Challenger to a pre-production Mustang GT that is weighed down with *every single option*? Here's a thought buddy: Why don't you wait until someone tests a Mustang GT with the performance pack and maybe the Recaro seats, and nothing else included... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanatWork Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 So, you're comparing the SRT Challenger to a pre-production Mustang GT that is weighed down with *every single option*? Here's a thought buddy: Why don't you wait until someone tests a Mustang GT with the performance pack and maybe the Recaro seats, and nothing else included... Ummm...not just the SRT Challenger, but the Hellcat. The normal SRT Challenger is unlikely to get under 4 seconds. So, yeah...the "failed" 2015 Mustang GT is slower to 60 than a 707 hp supercharged Dodge that costs twice as much. Shocker!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 It's almost time for the Wah-mbulance......ooooo, I'm scared Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 It's almost time for the Wah-mbulance......ooooo, I'm scaredDude, what's up with the personal attacks/name calling? Not cool. If someone has a different viewpoint than you, then these forums are more than open to debate, as long as it's done in an adult manner. (Using adult vocabulary while you're at it....)hey dude, if you don't like what someone says,too bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 It's almost time for the Wah-mbulance......ooooo, I'm scaredDude, what's up with the personal attacks/name calling? Not cool. If someone has a different viewpoint than you, then these forums are more than open to debate, as long as it's done in an adult manner. (Using adult vocabulary while you're at it....)hey dude, if you don't like what someone says,too bad. Wow. "Stupidness"?!? That's kinda all anyone needs to see in this exchange. are you the word professor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 First - it's Grammar Nazi, not word professor. Second - grow up. Third (and since you're going to ignore the second one)..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang let back Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 First - it's Grammar Nazi, not word Second - grow up. Third (and since you're going to ignore the second one)..... well, it's obvious the demons, of stupidity, has taken you over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Try making a logical argument instead of just saying "your stupid" and you have a slight chance of being taken seriously. Very slight, but a chance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 (edited) Dude, what's up with the personal attacks/name calling? Not cool. If someone has a different viewpoint than you, then these forums are more than open to debate, as long as it's done in an adult manner. (Using adult vocabulary while you're at it....) 12 year old punks decency-challenged children only now how to call names. You can't have an adult discussion with them. Edited September 18, 2014 by fordmantpw 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoonerLS Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 12 year old punks decency-challenged children only now how to call names. You can't have an adult discussion with them.I opened the thread expecting to see a discussion about the new Mustang, and I somehow wandered into a grade school argument. I'm shocked that I haven't seen "I know you are, but what am I?" yet. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 I opened the thread expecting to see a discussion about the new Mustang, and I somehow wandered into a grade school argument. I'm shocked that I haven't seen "I know you are, but what am I?" yet. I'm rubber, you're glue! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.