Jump to content

2015 Light-Duty V8 Challenge


Recommended Posts

@twintornados....easy...Ford stopped putting the 6.2 in the f-150 for one reason...take rate was trivial, and the eco boost does everything better.

I agree...the 6.2L in F150 was "overkill" and was rightfully deleted from the "regular" lineup (not including Raptor) The 6.2L is a motor best designated for larger trucks, i.e. F250 on up.....It is just that PickupTrucks.com still wants to re-live those glory days when you ordered up a big honkin' V8 in your half ton truck and passed everything on the road....except a gas station.

Edited by twintornados
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I thought they also said it was the only pre-production truck they could get there hands on..so no Ecoboost 3.5L to bring

 

That was why it was a $47K XLT and not a $54K Lariat like the GMs.

 

How are you going to bring a twin turbo V6 to a "V8 challenge"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but the 6.2L in the GM trucks prove that you can still have the big V8 and superior fuel economy. According to this pickuptrucks.com test anyway. The 10 speed transmission can't come soon enough to these new F150's.

It's economy isn't better than the 3.5L, though, since both are top engines. As per feuleconomy.gov, the 3.5L Ecoboost is 15% more efficient with no cyclinder deactivation or 8-speed transmission. This is generation 1 Ecoboost. The 2.7L is 23% with none of the Chevy's advantages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ there's no way it was a full 1/4 mile or even 1/8th. The fastest 2.7L article i've read puts it at 15.1 seconds, almost a full second behind GM's 6.2L. The 3.5EB clocks in at 14.8.

 

edit... I just looked it up. The fast lane did the test and the length was only 282 feet. The 2.7 will get walked on the big end.

Edited by Hydro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ there's no way it was a full 1/4 mile or even 1/8th. The fastest 2.7L article i've read puts it at 15.1 seconds, almost a full second behind GM's 6.2L. The 3.5EB clocks in at 14.8.

 

edit... I just looked it up. The fast lane did the test and the length was only 282 feet. The 2.7 will get walked on the big end.

Yes, but for the 2.7EB to do so well up against the bigger engines means it has some good low end grunt. And you have to consider the 2.7EB truck weighs the same as the 3.5EB tested, roughly. So the 2.7EB faired really well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ definitely, the 2.7 can hold it's own. I was curious on why he was revving the 3.5EB up and down then left the line? The best launches I get is 4 wheel engaged, spool up to 2300 RPM and let her rip. He wasn't mean enough to the 3.5, just kinda babied it :baby: .

Edited by Hydro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...