I was 10 years into a 37 year career......

The real Elephant in the room is that you graduated from high school in 1996...I was 2 years into my recently retired 30 1/2 year career....

Not a single person other than you thought of a motorcycle when reading that 😒

its me or the grille has changed, not the inside but the form of it, check how the hood ends on top of the grille vs the current model, or maybe it is just the camo    

I'm looking for people's hwy mpg experience with 6.7L

Oh now I see it, yeah that's not great. 

Very good..just saw this...534? You must be another old dude😎

Yea, exactly.   Engineers measure road damage using something called the “fourth power law“—a fancy way of saying damage increases exponentially with weight, but only becomes significant when you’re talking about truly heavy vehicles. Your ICE-to-EV passenger car upgrade? Barely a blip on the infrastructure radar.   Picture this: you’re arguing about who ate the last slice of pizza while an entire buffet sits untouched in the next room. That’s essentially the EV weight debate when trucks are involved.   “Load-related damage to pavement and bridges is caused almost exclusively by heavy trucks,” explains Mark Gottlieb, a civil engineer who studies infrastructure wear. “The contribution from autos and light trucks is insignificant. It makes no difference if they are EV or internal combustion.”

Maybe a two billion lesson that can happen again when manufacturers think they can skirt regulatory issues??  PITA that regulation can be Also gives me another soap box to talk about gasoline in class 6 and 7😎

And gasoline also has a place  in class 6 and 7 trucks where the vehicle is a support to the primary business.  In other words the utilization is such that it is NOT high mileage and  fuel consumption is not is key factor--in particular where the lesser cost of the gasoline option also makes sense.   Unfortunately the the product planners at Ford continue to ignore this factor.