-
Files
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
To be clear, reducing Ford to only these vehicles would not increase profits but would increase margins. This could only be true if every vehicle Ford produce except these lost money.
-
By twintornados · Posted
I am talking about maximizing through shared body panels and interior items. I am sure they do share parts, but by sharing panels and interiors, it spreads out the economy of scale significantly. -
By fuzzymoomoo · Posted
There’s already a lot shared between the two… -
Bronco pickup only makes sense if Ranger gets replaced by a unibody version. I don't see how Ford can make all new affordable pickups at TTC unless they're small and midsized unibodies to replace Maverick and Ranger.
-
Sunk costs, dealers, Bill Ford, potential future EPA regs, UAW
-
By Sherminator98 · Posted
CAFE and other tax on engine sizes in other parts of the world. -
The pink ones, obviously......
-
them whompies are closing up my sinuses. You better back off another 10...
-
Interesting discussion point: If Ford was completely about profit, it would shrink the business to just F Series and large SUV plants and skip the rest…….maybe keep Explorer/Aviator, Transit and T6 products. The business would be highly profitable with a very small manufacturing and engineering footprint so why don’t they?
-
By twintornados · Posted
Better then the Jimmy haulin' hogs I guess....
-
-
Topics
-
-
Top Downloads
-
