MGolden Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 We have a small fleet (13) of f350 trucks all configured the same or very similar; cc, 8ft beds, 4.30 rear, gas engines. Loaded with tools they weigh in daily at 10,000-11,000. All but 2 have 6.2L engines. The other 2 have the 7.3L and are nearing 40k miles already and i thought i would share some general observations. First, the 7.3L combined with the 10 speed is a major power upgrade! It seems to never be working hard compared to the 6.2. It might seem strange, but the ride is quieter with the 7.3 as the engine isnt reving all the time to make power. There are times we tow a large compressor or diesel generator and the new powertrain shows major improvement. The electric assist power steering is a nice upgrade. My opinion is that it provides some feedback of the terrain but not near as much as the old hydraulic setup, which could be harsh. The biggest surprise is the improved fuel economy. The 6.2l trucks are consistant, with daily/normal driving we see low 10mpg avg. Both of the 7.3L are now at low 12mpg. The power and driveability improvements were really great, but this mpg increase is a major bonus. If the 7.3L stays reliable for the long haul, Ford has a real winner with this combo. We are waiting on 2 more pickups and a f450 stake body (which the orders have been delayed twice) and cant wait to get them into service. Matt 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 I think the 10 speed tranny really works well with larger engines to provide great fuel economy - in some cases as good or better than smaller engines. My 3.5eb F150 just loafs along at 1200 rpm up to 50 mph and doesn’t have to downshift even on hills. I can easily get 22-25 mpg on the highway and I’ve seen 27+ on rare occasions. Thats why I don’t believe the new 6.8 will be that much more efficient than the 7.3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 17 minutes ago, akirby said: Thats why I don’t believe the new 6.8 will be that much more efficient than the 7.3. Perhaps efficiency isn't the main objective ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, fuzzymoomoo said: Perhaps efficiency isn't the main objective ? Which leaves size and the only place that makes sense is Raptor. So that I could see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Kat Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 That 6.8 is gonna be a Mustang and F150 engine. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7Mary3 Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 (edited) What's the new 6.8L? First I have heard of such an engine. Edited September 24, 2020 by 7Mary3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92merc Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 11 minutes ago, 7Mary3 said: What's the new 6.8L? First I have heard of such an engine. It's been the topic of discussion in the Unifor thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snooter Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 An uncorked 2013 f350 6.7PS pulling a 37' camper will return 18.5mpg...i am doing over 20mpg without the load....the gassers are pathetic (mpg) regardless of how it is spinned by the blue kool aid fanatics.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 5 hours ago, snooter said: An uncorked 2013 f350 6.7PS pulling a 37' camper will return 18.5mpg...i am doing over 20mpg without the load....the gassers are pathetic (mpg) regardless of how it is spinned by the blue kool aid fanatics.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theoldwizard Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 8 hours ago, snooter said: An uncorked 2013 f350 6.7PS pulling a 37' camper will return 18.5mpg... Uncorked as in some emission control equipment bypassed ? Are you running DEF ? No company that wants to stay in business is going to bypass emission equipment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLPRacing Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 10 hours ago, snooter said: An uncorked 2013 f350 6.7PS pulling a 37' camper will return 18.5mpg...i am doing over 20mpg without the load....the gassers are pathetic (mpg) regardless of how it is spinned by the blue kool aid fanatics.... The 6.7PS is a $8455 option over the 7.3Gas. You can buy a lot of gas for $8455 plus the money you save on maintenance. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.