Agreed, the details are a little odd as well. I like the shape of the DRLs, but their placement is off. They look pinched, like they're too close together.   I think this looks better. 

The styling looks like a mix of different products. The greenhouse looks like its from a Camry 

Very good analysis, I think Ford is revelling in the confusing opinions 

When Ford announced the change in name to Tennessee Truck Plant, it Alamo announced  that the new vehicle would be an affordable gas powered truck    and yes, several times I’ve said that Ford’s idea of affordable is different to what many buyers think. Its their way of presenting premium prices that appear to be good value but only to particular buyers.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/ford-plans-an-affordable-gas-powered-truck-thats-not-the-maverick-how-will-that-work   They've stated it's affordable. That being said, time will tell how affordable is affordable. 

The point of getting Ranger out of MAP would be to make more Bronco SUVs. 

https://www.motor1.com/news/793587/vw-id-unyx-09-debut/  

If I buy a mustang as a toy it's going to be a 70 boss 302 grabber blue with black stripes.   As for manuals I'll take a DCT over the automatic or manual.  Better performance than both and easier to drive in traffic.  And you still get to shift.  And I like manuals but I do not miss the clutch.

No one said the Tennessee truck will be affordable. Just midsize. 🤣   I'm fairly certain it will be a more expensive truck than Ranger.    Just look at the price difference between Bronco Raptor and Ranger Raptor to understand what Ford is thinking here. Ranger nameplate has an upper limit on what MSRP the market will support. The new truck (maybe it will be Bronco branded or not... who knows) will probably be hybrid or PHEV focused and will lean way more offroad-oriented than Ranger.