-
Files
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
By DeluxeStang · Posted
What if said supercar is far more robust than your average supercar, and therefore far less likely to be damaged by going off-road? -
By DeluxeStang · Posted
The 300k price tag is something people are pulling out of their ass. Farley didn't say anything about pricing. -
P.S. — No mention on even more affordable model S which will have considerably smaller battery and slightly less powerful motor. Initial press release said it had a 52 kWh battery and 206 miles of range. That should reduce MSRP by thousands compared to S+.
-
By fordmantpw · Posted
OK, so after listening to Farley's explanation, it makes more sense what they're doing and what they are after. -
Good news for EV buyers, not as great for competing manufacturers. Not bad for up to 303 miles of range which happens to be cheapest option, the S+.
-
Buried the lede on bigger issue? 😀 We've all known EVs have high issuance premiums due to higher MSRP and higher repair costs, but the cost for model Y and especially Model 3 seem way out of line compared to Cybertruck. If correct, and I’m not sure it is, Model 3 owners must be horrible drivers as a group.
-
By fordmantpw · Posted
People don't take $300k supercars out when the sun isn't shining. Nor will they take them offroad. I was excited about this until I saw the $300k price tag. -
I instead think "why would I want to take my supercar offroad to get damaged".
-
By DeluxeStang · Posted
That's interesting, because having the sex appeal and driving dynamics of a supercar, but having it be something that can handle rough terrain, all sorts of weather, I can definitely see the appeal behind that. -
By Motorpsychology · Posted
I think the only "off road" such a vehicle is likely to see is the viewing lane at a Barrett Jackson auction.
-
-
Topics
-
-
Top Downloads
-
