Jump to content

2015 Mustang 50 Year Limited Edition unveiled


Recommended Posts

Let's see... this year the wife and I will have our 8th wedding anniversary... on the day that we begin year 9 of our marriage.

So when we celebrate, are we commemorating the beginning of year 9... or the completion of year 8?

 

Apply that to this Mustang. Does this edition commemorate the beginning of year 51... or the completion of year 50?

 

-------------

 

Oh, and I like the car, even in white, which is rare for me. Just wish Ford would release those power numbers already!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How many full years of production have there been?

I could be sarcastic and say all of them, but currently the Mustang is in its 50th production year.

 

I understand the marketing aspect, I really do, but the math don't lie. 2004 was the 40th. 2004 + 10 = ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ford Mustang was brought out five months before the normal start of the 1965 production year. The earliest versions are often referred to as 1964½ models, but VIN coded by Ford and titled as 1965 models[8] with production beginning in Dearborn, Michigan on March 9, 1964[9] and the new car was introduced to the public on April 17, 1964[10] at the New York World's Fair.[11]

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mustang

 

 

2014 - 1965 = 49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do laugh out loud when someone says a '64.5 Model Mustang. I really REALLY do. There is no such thing. But please, Carry on

The '64 1/2 designation was never used by Ford for the Mustang as all Mustangs built between March 9, 1964 and August 15, 1964 carried serial numbers beginning with 5 designating a 1965 model. Ford did advertise the 1963 V-8 and fastback Falcons as '63 1/2 cars as they were introduced in the Spring of 1963. Those cars carried 1963 serial numbers. Ford did print a small number of post cards with the legend 1964 Mustang prior to introduction. These are very rare and valuable. None of the print ads referenced a model year until after intro of the GT in the Spring of1965.

 

The term '64 1/2 was created by Mustang enthusiasts as a shorthand way of differentiating the early '65s from the regular model year '65s. The cars themselves had a number of differences, most notably generator charging systems, F-Code 260, D-Code 289 and U-Code 170 I-6 engines, two, speed heater, Flat edge carpet, color keyed door lock buttons, skirted hood and beveled headlight buckets, large frame mounted horns, unteathered gas cap, shorter 4 3/8" Mustang nameplates, slotted spare tire hold down, hook and eyebolt seat belt mounts and louvered radiator support. Some of these parts did find their way onto cars built after August '64 as the trim and body pieces were used until the supplies were exhausted. (my '65 fastback built in September, had the early style hood and headlight buckets and flat edge carpet).

 

I guess credit for popularizing the term '64 1/2 goes to Ray Miller, who divided his 1978 book Mustang Does It onto separate chapters for 1964 1/2 and 1965. Colin Date's Mustang Collector's Guide does the same.

post-16479-0-20404000-1397705391_thumb.jpg

Edited by Mark B. Morrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The model in question is 2015. If we have 49 years of production models ending in the year 2014 then logically the 2015 model will be year model 50. I thought it was obvious.

 

OK, I was having a problem telling if your equation was counting model years or production years. If it's model years, then no problem and I agree.

 

 

The point is the 2014 is 49 years old, not 50. The 2015 is therefore 50.

 

You know how sometimes people can agree with each other and still fight about it? I think I inadvertently did that with you and BlackHorse. :poke: :poke:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2004 was the 40th. 2004 + 10 = ?

 

Yeah, and they've done that for the past 20 years (viz. model years for the 30th, 35th, 40th, and 45th), so I can see where you're coming from.

 

But, frankly, it's always seemed odd to me that did that. Rather than consider *this* practice to be odd, I consider previous practice to be odd. They celebrated the anniversary of the calendar year of the launch with a corresponding model year, which doesn't quite match up (the 30th anniversary of the Mustang launch was 1994, but why celebrate it with a 1994 model, instead of with a 1995, corresponding to 30 full production runs, as well as 30 full years?)

Edited by RichardJensen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The point is the 2014 is 49 years old, not 50. The 2015 is therefore 50.

Ok. Get ready to count.

 

1965 is 1.

1966 is 2.

1967 is 3.

1968 is 4.

1969 is 5.

1970 is 6.

1971 is 7.

1972 is 8.

1973 is 9.

1974 is 10.

1975 is 11.

1976 is 12.

1977 is 13.

1978 is 14.

1979 is 15.

1980 is 16.

1981 is 17.

1982 is 18.

1983 is 19.

1984 is 20.

1985 is 21.

1986 is 22.

1987 is 23.

1988 is 24.

1989 is 25.

1990 is 26.

1991 is 27.

1992 is 28.

1993 is 29.

1994 is 30.

1995 is 31.

1996 is 32.

1997 is 33.

1998 is 34.

1999 is 35.

2000 is 36.

2001 is 37.

2002 is 38.

2003 is 39.

2004 is 40.

2005 is 41.

2006 is 42.

2007 is 43.

2008 is 44.

2009 is 45.

2010 is 46.

2011 is 47.

2012 is 48.

2013 is 49.

2014 is the 50th model year.

 

I can't make it any simpler than that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok. Get ready to count.

 

1965 is 1.

...

2014 is the 50th model year.

 

I can't make it any simpler than that.

 

Irrelevant. "Anniversary" refers to *completed* years, ergo:

 

Model Year 1966 = 1st Anniversary of launch

Model Year 1967 = 2nd Anniversary of launch

Model Year 1968 = 3rd Anniversary of launch

----

Model Year 2015 = 50th Anniversary of launch

 

And as I said, it's not as though I don't understand what you're saying. It's just that Ford's practice from '94 on has been odd.

 

The 25th Anniversary edition was applied to 1990 MY vehicles: http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/Ride/Show/1078

Edited by RichardJensen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2014 - 40th anniversary

 

Enough said.

 

You guys can think what you want. If you want to be so arrogant that even simple math won't persuade you to say you're mistaken, then so be it.

 

You must have meant 2004. As Richard pointed out - that was wrong.

 

Answer this question - if you were married on April 17, 1964 which anniversary would you be celebrating today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You must have meant 2004. As Richard pointed out - that was wrong.

 

Answer this question - if you were married on April 17, 1964 which anniversary would you be celebrating today?

 

Which model year is in production on 4/17/2014? If it's the '15, then label the '15 as the 50th anniversary edition. If it's the '14, then the '14 should be the 50th anniversary edition. Because after 4/17/2014, the 51st year begins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...