Jump to content

Ford Workers Impacted By EV Delay Offered New Placements


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Trader 10 said:

I wonder if Ford will eventually announce that Oakville will be closed. 


I would expect Flat Rock to close before Oakville. OAC is a much more efficient plant than Flat Rock has ever been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, fuzzymoomoo said:


I would expect Flat Rock to close before Oakville. OAC is a much more efficient plant than Flat Rock has ever been. 

I don't expect either of them to close.  Flat Rock may not be the most efficient, but it makes Ford a lot of money like GM's Corvette plant.  Closing either of them will be politically toxic and the UAW now has the right to strike the company over plant closings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Trader 10 said:

I wonder if Ford will eventually announce that Oakville will be closed. 

If they’re gonna close our plant they should just fuckin close it! Why wait?! They keep changing the plan anyways so why would we trust Ford??? Idling a plant for 3 years is complete and utter bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Oac98 said:

If they’re gonna close our plant they should just fuckin close it! Why wait?! They keep changing the plan anyways so why would we trust Ford??? Idling a plant for 3 years is complete and utter bullshit.


They can’t close it they need the capacity.  They just got caught out by some incredibly stupid product planning.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akirby said:


They can’t close it they need the capacity.  They just got caught out by some incredibly stupid product planning.

You’re so right about the poor planning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2024 at 2:38 AM, Oac98 said:

You’re so right about the poor planning. 

I feel for you guys now, hitting the delay button was just the easy decision for Ford

as I doubt that Farley really knows what to do now as that could change again by next year.

 

Oakville is such a big plant, it seems like a crime not to build multiple products, particularly 

when Canada is an export hub for ROW markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jpd80 said:

I feel for you guys now, hitting the delay button was just the easy decision for Ford

as I doubt that Farley really knows what to do now as that could change again by next year.

 

Oakville is such a big plant, it seems like a crime not to build multiple products, particularly 

when Canada is an export hub for ROW markets.

I’m ok as I’m a veteran worker, it’s the people with the low seniority who are greater affected by this delay. I’m still extremely frustrated with Ford and some of Farleys decisions.  I’m almost expecting the plan to change again because that seems to be the norm now.  One EV product will not be enough volume for that plant. The Lincoln u760 is up in the air so I know there is only one product right now. From talk of 5 to 1 for now. The union kept saying there is a Ford and a Lincoln then a third product coming like 2028 or later. Ill believe this stuff when and if I actually see it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Oac98 said:

I’m ok as I’m a veteran worker, it’s the people with the low seniority who are greater affected by this delay. I’m still extremely frustrated with Ford and some of Farleys decisions.  I’m almost expecting the plan to change again because that seems to be the norm now.  One EV product will not be enough volume for that plant. The Lincoln u760 is up in the air so I know there is only one product right now. From talk of 5 to 1 for now. The union kept saying there is a Ford and a Lincoln then a third product coming like 2028 or later. I’ll believe this stuff when and if I actually see it.

Absolutely true.

Honestly, if most people were given the choice, they’d probably pick a next generation 

Edge over a Mach E simply because the change to BEV is just too much for most buyers.

When it comes to three row BEV clinic results, I think the decision was even more clear cut,

Ford knew that and with the current battery tech, it was on a hiding to nothing if released,

 the Tesla X probably covers most of those would be buyers anyway

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jpd80 said:

Absolutely true.

Honestly, if most people were given the choice, they’d probably pick a next generation 

Edge over a Mach E simply because the change to BEV is just too much for most buyers.

When it comes to three row BEV clinic results, I think the decision was even more clear cut,

Ford knew that and with the current battery tech, it was on a hiding to nothing if released,

 the Tesla X probably covers most of those would be buyers anyway

It would’ve been great to see a new edge hybrid and nautilus built at OAC as weve said ad nauseum here. I agree with you that ford had to go back to the lab with this u759 mystery product. I suppose they’re playing the long game and all of this is supposed to be for the better. I truly hope it is. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2024 at 9:52 AM, akirby said:


They can’t close it they need the capacity.  They just got caught out by some incredibly stupid product planning.

Or do they? Ford has signaled they don’t for the next 3 1/2 years and obviously is unsure if BEV demand will allow the plant to be operated profitably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Trader 10 said:

Or do they? Ford has signaled they don’t for the next 3 1/2 years and obviously is unsure if BEV demand will allow the plant to be operated profitably. 


If BEVs aren’t needed then there are plenty of ICE vehicles that can be built there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, akirby said:


If BEVs aren’t needed then there are plenty of ICE vehicles that can be built there.

I agree with you on this point,  if Ford would just get busy and develop a new Edge rather than let the plant Sit idle for multiple years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Trader 10 said:

I agree with you on this point,  if Ford would just get busy and develop a new Edge rather than let the plant Sit idle for multiple years. 

 

This is the problem, its going to still take at least 24 months or so to spool up production to build something there if they went that route.

 

Then how long does it stay in production? Even with political considerations, the goal is something like 80-90% EVs by 2035. Even if its not mandated at national level, you have 18 or so states, which most of them are in the top ten of car sales, using California's regulations for EVs. 

 

So are you going to tool up a product, say a refreshed Edge from China, just to have it go into production roughly the same time the 3 row EVs do, but only be able to sell it for say 8-9 years, if that? They still have to recoup the price of new tooling and other things (depending on how much can be reused).

 

All the while the EV charging and improvements in Range will be still happening and prices should drop. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, silvrsvt said:

 

This is the problem, its going to still take at least 24 months or so to spool up production to build something there if they went that route.

 

Then how long does it stay in production? Even with political considerations, the goal is something like 80-90% EVs by 2035. Even if its not mandated at national level, you have 18 or so states, which most of them are in the top ten of car sales, using California's regulations for EVs. 

 

So are you going to tool up a product, say a refreshed Edge from China, just to have it go into production roughly the same time the 3 row EVs do, but only be able to sell it for say 8-9 years, if that? They still have to recoup the price of new tooling and other things (depending on how much can be reused).

 

All the while the EV charging and improvements in Range will be still happening and prices should drop. 


It was just an incredibly dumb move to have “planned” how they did.  They needed a dual approach as things transitioned and let customers decide.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, rmc523 said:


It was just an incredibly dumb move to have “planned” how they did.  They needed a dual approach as things transitioned and let customers decide.

 

Not exactly-the Edge and Nautilus made up about 7% of total FMC sales in 2023. The introduction of the Bronco Sport and Bronco sold roughly double what the Edge and Nautilus did in 2023 when it comes to market share. You could also add the Mach E into that if you wanted to. Also how is the midsize 2 row CUV market doing? It seems like its shrinking IMO-I remember I'd see Muranios and Edges around all the time about 10 years ago and since then the market has shrunk, because I guess people are either getting larger products or going smaller because they are cheaper. 

 

Anyways I think the EVs where affected by COVID, which slowed down their introduction then ran head into rapid changes in the market place when it came to EVs-Inflation and the corresponding reaction of raising interest rates which is making people shy away from expensive toys (i.e. Bronco also) and products that might not have a long shelf life with an impact to EVs with new and improved ones-having a product that gets say 50 miles more range then what you have now is going to impact resale if you bought. Its more plateable when your paying no interest or next to no interest on a car to do that. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 5/17/2024 at 12:52 AM, akirby said:


They can’t close it they need the capacity.  They just got caught out by some incredibly stupid product planning.

Never a truer word said.

Baked  in was  Bill Ford’s desire for Ford to becoming a full line electric vehicle maker,

we know the story of successive CEOs trying and failing with clarifying product focus

to keep profits coming in but also open the door to the future, Ford needs balance.

 

It seems like good crisis actually makes Ford reset and prioritise, they do their best work

when the company’s future is on the line and that’s why I hope they make some big changes.

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2024 at 1:21 AM, jpd80 said:

Never a truer word said.

Baked  in was  Bill Ford’s desire for Ford to becoming a full line electric vehicle maker,

we know the story of successive CEOs trying and failing with clarifying product focus

to keep profits coming in but also open the door to the future, Ford needs balance.

 

It seems like good crisis actually makes Ford reset and prioritise, they do their best work

when the company’s future is on the line and that’s why I hope they make some big changes.

I certainly hope you’re right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...