I am retired and live in Boston but have house in Maine we have two vehicles, a Model 3 LR and Maverick Lariat.  We put about  10,000 miles per year total.  Depending on the range and towing capacity I would definitely consider trading both vehicles for a Long Range Maverick sized e-truck. I love both the Maverick and the Model 3, a vehicle capturing the best of both would be ideal for me.  

I do think there will be some cannibalization, which is why I've said, Ford can only offer so many trucks before tis just starts eating into its own sales.  Same with the affordable ice/hybrid pickup as you mention.   This is why I feel like it almost has to be the Bronco pickup, with the base price sliding under that $40k line.   Slotting another product into the Maverick/Maverick EV/Ranger size that is similar just doesn't make sense to me.

Yeah, i suppose that's also possible.

I've been thinking about this-about the rumored price of the CE1-if it is closer to the 30K market, what is going to keep people from migrating from the Maverick (28K starting MSRP) or the Ranger ($32K starting MSRP) from moving to it? Its not a bad thing for Ford to have this issue, but I truly wonder how much of an impact it will have on those two products, since its supposed to be a goldie locks sized product between them. I guess its going to have some sort of caveat that will make people have to choose between the Ranger/Maverick (say towing range) or this.   Also how does the "affordable ICE/hybrid" Pickup slot into this whole mess of product 😛  

Toyota, Oh we aren't working on EVs....comes out with four of them.   Lets see how the market reacts to them. 

Yep, the vocal minority the bitches about anything and everything the other side does 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/supreme-court-strikes-down-trump-150711549.html

But what makes things even more confusing is if the 2024 was all new, then I'd consider the 2010 all new even if it wasn't given a new generational code assignment.    I guess to clarify when I say I believe we'll get an all new mustang in 2028/29 what I'm saying is all new bodywork, and significant platform and powertrain tweaks. That could be a new generation like it was for s650, or it could be considered a heavy refresh like the 2010, but that's what I'm thinking of, that level of change.    The s650 as a pretty mild update, which is why I don't believe as it currently sits, it'll be around as long as a radical redesign like the s550 was. I get the impression Ford's mentality with s650 was they didn't know where the future of the industry was going, so they kept investment to a minimum. As things become clearer, and a stronger direction emerges, that's when they'll invest in a more substantial redesign. I believe we have that now with them understanding combustion power is the future for mustang, either by itself or with a hybrid setup. 

On further review it appears e-tnga was a joint project with Subaru.

Agree that it wouldn't make sense to debut something brand new for a refresh that would be replaced not long after for a next-gen.   What is confusing to me, though is the timeline.   Let's look at the last few generations:   2005 - All new (S197) 2010 - heavy refresh 2015 - all new (S550) 2018 - refresh 2024 - "all" new (S650) 2028?   So that was 10 years for S197 and S550.  S197 was a 5/5 split for refresh, while S550 was a 3/7 split.   An all new for 2028ish would be a short lifecycle based on recent history.........   So either, the refresh (plus sedan) will have a long lifecycle of 6+ years before replacement, or maybe since S650 wasn't truly all new, maybe they're willing to move on faster?