Something like this would be perfect for a CE1 sedan. Sedans are naturally pretty areo efficient, so hopefully we can just skip the odd areo look in favor of something more conventional. 

It would be a great look for a sedan. The GT DRLs would make sense. Could be like a Ford Xiaomi SU7.   Edit: a liftback would work too anc I get the feeling its going to be increasingly favored for aero and practicality. 

I actually like the looks of the red one.  I wouldn't have bought one because I don't need a 7-seater.   It's really a shame it never made it to market after all that work.  Had to be very disappointing for the team involved to put all that effort into something that never was produced.   But, Ford will definitely make more money producing Super Duty trucks at OAC as opposed to this thing that would have likely sold in similar volumes to the Flex.

It seems like when Farley talks about differentiating when he talks about no boring products. In that sense, with its aero radical shape, it's certainly different and not boring. That being said, I feel like this differentiated strategy is really smart, but I feel like Ford needs to understand better the difference between good and bad different. Just because something is different doesn't mean it's good.    When it comes to different design, there's "That's awesome, I want one" and there's "What the hell is that abomination". Ford needs to put trusted talent in place where they're constantly doing the former, and avoiding the later. 

This morning's updated gas prices in Hamden, CT 06514 (Greater New Haven) $4.29 Regular (Cash) @ Citgo (Increase $0.10 from $4.19)

Can confirm the window sticker for my 17 BL MKZ 3.0T AWD was a hair over 60k

It violates the "No Boring Products" edict. Problem is, because of aerodynamics needed for a proper EV, any proper EV is going to do the same. There's going to have to be a sacrifice made to have some excitement injected into these things.

It just wasn't cohesive either. It's a super round front end with a squared off and sharp roof and rear end. It just doesn't work visually. 

IMO the biggest problem with it is that it lacked any sort of style to it...its an amorphic blob 

We jumped from $3.53 for 87 E10 to 3.89 Thursday morning. Today it's down slightly to $3.85. Everybody seems to have gravitated to $1-1.10 more for 91 E0. In the recent past, 91 E0 could vary by as much as 75¢ a gallon in a 5 mile radius of my home.