-
Files
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
Trying to give people a chance to peek at the overall proportions without revealing everything Ford is openly excited about it but yes, makes me wonder if they are seeking positive feedback
-
Absolutely Correct and the reason Maverick is not boring is because it doesn’t look like every other utility on the market
-
I’d really like to see a Lincoln version of the Ineos Grenadier. It has the classic, boxy, off roader style like the G Wagon and Defender, but at a more reasonable price. I think it needs a fixed roof, but something like the grenadiers roof could work as well.
-
By HotRunrGuy · Posted
Some would say that the Santa Cruz was more attractive, and we all know how that worked out. Heck, I'm just hoping that the (possible) 2028 update doesn't screw the Maverick up. I'll be more than ready for a new one by then. HRG -
And some would be wrong. None of Ford's trucks can rightly be called boring not even Maverick. That's why they were able to raise prices. More direct competition might lower ATPs slightly but I don't see a big sales drop.
-
By ausrutherford · Posted
I believe the other boxy Lincoln that was shown to the dealers several years ago was the Rivian-based Lincoln that was planned, not Bronco-based. -
By Sherminator98 · Posted
Eh its about the same level of effort that Ford used on Mercury. -
Some would argue the Maverick is boring but it sells...because even though it has gone up in price it's still competitive and no real competition. If there was a competitive product-and slightly more appealing to the eye, what would happen?
-
I know the whole Nissan/Renault/Mitsubishi trifecta is in trouble, but geez... this is a poor effort even for them. It's on par with badging the Outlander as a Nissan Rogue Hybrid.
-
For the Mercedes snobs, sure. But Ford knows more about off road looks and performance and Lincoln is just as luxurious the last decade or so. No reason to think they can't compete.
-
-
Topics
-
-
Top Downloads
-
