Avoid importation?
I have a feeling that the Bronco Sport made at Valencia will be for Europe and ROW markets only
and that a US evolution of that vehicle gets built at Hermosillo as a second generation Bronco Sport.
Thinking about the new Bronco Sport length vs Escape:
Current Bronco Sport length 172”
Current Ecape Length 178”
First generation boxy Escape length 173”
2005-2007 boxy Escape Length 174.9”
2nd Gen boxy Escape length 174.7”
thinking logically, a new Bronco Sport that’s 175”-176” long is still technically shorter than the latest Escape
but would probably work much better at convincing Escape buyers to try it…exactly what Ford wants.
It's not a premium. The only options were the wheels and the paint, vapor blue, was a 450(!) dollar option. I liked the color so much, and I didn't want another grayscale car, I ponied up for the paint.
We've said that for years. It's always been that way thanks in part to high labor costs. The only reason they kept building them in the 80s, 90s and 2000s is because of UAW contracts and CAFE benefits. That's also the reason they didn't care about platform costs. They didn't expect them to be profitable.
The only difference is you're saying they just quit making them and we're saying they replaced or are replacing most of them with new better products.
Your just moving the goal posts bringing up products that where stopped being made 30-40 years ago with acknowledging that the market has changed in several different ways during that time.
Small cars haven’t made a profit for the big three for over 45 years…why would they do so now?
Someone once said
"Ford is in the business of making money, not making vehicles."
This explained the cancellation of small cars, large cars, midsize cars, all cars, the Ranger, the Bronco, Transit Connect, Windstar, Aerostar, etc.
CAFE and profitability are excuses for the lack of investment in competitive products.
There, Ford struggles to build low-margin vehicles profitably. It's been this way for decades. There isn't any evidence that this has changed.
Notice Escape is actually cheaper now? And you can't compare a well equipped 4 door Maverick to a cheap 3 door Focus or Fiesta that was sold at a loss as a CAFE offset.
So yes Ford stopped selling dirt cheap cars that lost money in favor of slightly more expensive vehicles that make money. How dare they do that.....
If you want to provide cheap vehicles as a community service then go start a non profit.
CT's moron governor says this will make cars less efficient and reduce MPG numbers. The car mfrs. are not going to intentionally make less efficient engines. And people aren't dropping like flies from CO2. I know 500 people and only one has asthma. Every human exhales 2.2 lbs. of CO2 per day. CO2 is CO2, no matter where it comes from. The population of the country/world has probably doubled in the last 50 years. So let's do away with people! Oh we are, they're called AI robots/androids! Check out the youtube video of Zager & Evans' IN THE YEAR 2525 with the middle aged woman in black and white.
Let's play a Game
Affordability is a Data point, Cheapness is a Feeling.
Comparing the Starting prices of the 2026 Escape, Bronco Sport and Maverick to the 2014 Escape Fiesta and Focus in 2025 and 2014 Dollars.
Adjusted for inflation, the price for an entry-level Ford vehicle in 2025 is 45-64% higher than it was in 2014
Finally, when compared with US household income, Ford's most affordable vehicle in 2026 would represent 34% of Median household income vs 26% in 2014, or a 31% higher share of a household's income in 2025 vs 2014.
This does not include the impact of higher interest rates
When we talk about affordable, I believe this is what we mean. Ford stopped selling Affordable vehicles in favor of profits.
The unboxed assembly process doesn't apply to ICE vehicles, there will be benifits From the eletrical archtecture but the assembly process isn't as transferable.