silvrsvt Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 https://www.motor1.com/news/578816/ford-maverick-st-spy-shots/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 No brainer. Sport suspension and tires. Corsair 2.3L EB drivetrain. $10k markup. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, akirby said: No brainer. Sport suspension and tires. Corsair 2.3L EB drivetrain. $10k markup. Absolutely, the drivetrain already exists but has never been extended to the other C2s like Escape ST or Bronco Sport ST. Mavrick ST makes perfect sense and may give reason to extend the ST to other vehicles… Edited April 18, 2022 by jpd80 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 51 minutes ago, jpd80 said: Absolutely, the drivetrain already exists but has never been extended to the other C2s like Escape ST or Bronco Sport ST. Mavrick ST makes perfect sense and may give reason to extend the ST to other vehicles… AWD only though or it doesn't make much sense. The advantages of the truck body would be lost otherwise. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 10 hours ago, akirby said: No brainer. Sport suspension and tires. Corsair 2.3L EB drivetrain. $10k markup. They're doing the $10k markup now.....lol 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 45 minutes ago, twintornados said: They're doing the $10k markup now.....lol Dealers are doing those markups, not Ford… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 4 hours ago, twintornados said: They're doing the $10k markup now.....lol $10k MSRP markup for Ford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 9 hours ago, jpd80 said: Dealers are doing those markups, not Ford… 6 hours ago, akirby said: $10k MSRP markup for Ford. Fellas..that's what the "lol" was for... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 18, 2022 Share Posted April 18, 2022 20 minutes ago, twintornados said: Fellas..that's what the "lol" was for... Oh LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ausrutherford Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 Ford has yet to trademark Maverick ST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 9 hours ago, ausrutherford said: Ford has yet to trademark Maverick ST. They might just use sport trim instead…… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzcat Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 4 hours ago, jpd80 said: They might just use sport trim instead…… "Sport" is a appearance package on Ford trucks. I'm guessing it will be Tremor or some other yet to be determined name plate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 1 hour ago, bzcat said: "Sport" is a appearance package on Ford trucks. I'm guessing it will be Tremor or some other yet to be determined name plate. But it was a performance trim on Edge, Fusion and Explorer at one time. Although edge and Explorer switched to ST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 15 hours ago, ausrutherford said: Ford has yet to trademark Maverick ST. They treat ST like a trim level so trademarking the name "Maverick ST" probably isn't necessary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 4 hours ago, fuzzymoomoo said: They treat ST like a trim level so trademarking the name "Maverick ST" probably isn't necessary ST is a trim level Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 16 minutes ago, jpd80 said: ST is a trim level Right, that's my point. They don't need to trademark anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 36 minutes ago, fuzzymoomoo said: Right, that's my point. They don't need to trademark anything Absolutely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 I was thinking we'd see a Rattler name on the Maverick at some point too, as since that's a lesser package than even Tremor, it could live up to that "lesser" name. Part of me thought they could put the Rattler name on this, but not sure if it'd fit with what look like some relatively lower profile tires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ausrutherford Posted April 19, 2022 Share Posted April 19, 2022 They have previously trademarked ST and RS models in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maginty Posted May 10, 2022 Share Posted May 10, 2022 I do think offering more power will sell, however from the picture if it has no 4k towing and a loss of ground clearance, the truck usefulness is gone. Even the standard AWD Maverick needs mechanical upgrades that the ST should include. That would be a select shift transmission, twin clutch rear diff, and a minimum 2.3 310hp/350 lbft engine. The Santa Cruz already has 281hp/311 lbft on 87 octane. From what I've seen this 2.3 engine on 87 has 275-280 hp, 320 lbft , so anything less than this top 2.3 would be a disappointment. On a side note, a lot of Ford engines have hp/torque ratings using 91-93 octane fuel, yet in the owners manual say designed to operate on regular unleaded with 87 octane, but frustratingly do not supply hp/torque figures on that 87 octane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 I'd like to see a Maverick Timberline edition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pffan1990 Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, twintornados said: I'd like to see a Maverick Timberline edition. Oh I'm sure that's coming. It's inevitable that Ford would apply the Timberline to the Maverick after success of Explorer and Expedition. There was an insider here that did mention some time ago that the Maverick was going to get a Timberline. I do think I remember him saying it would be available for the 2023 model year. Edited: It could be possible the ST would be applied for the Maverick. I'm sure that if they do, there would also be the sporty ST-Line trim as well. I agree with some others that there could/should be the Rattler trim as well as a step up above the FX4 package. Edited May 11, 2022 by pffan1990 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 Or they mimic Bronco Sport - Badlands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 1 hour ago, akirby said: Or they mimic Bronco Sport - Badlands. Eh, I see that staying "Bronco" only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted May 11, 2022 Share Posted May 11, 2022 10 hours ago, rmc523 said: Eh, I see that staying "Bronco" only. Yeah I guess Maverick is more truck than Bronco. But it can share all the BS badlands hardware. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.