-
Files
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
By blazerdude20 · Posted
Silly but also I get it. So many owners do not use it at all. -
By twintornados · Posted
That can cover a LOT of things for sure......love it!! -
By DeluxeStang · Posted
Exactly, something with a look closer to a car than a truck would have massive aero improvements, with the added benefit of appealing to people who don't like the traditional blocky truck look, which is a sizable demographic. -
By blazerdude20 · Posted
Remember Hanlon’s Razor “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity” -
Plus, like you said, aero and software efficiency can make a huge difference. Ford has way more resources and testing data, so I wouldn’t be shocked if they squeeze out better real-world range than the early estimates. Also, trucks in general are huge bricks aerodynamically, so even small improvements add up. -
-
-
By Bob Rosadini · Posted
Well if I had to bet I would say "haste makes waste". In the rush to correct the first problem they may have missed something. Roof? Thick black smoke? Says to me perhaps some stack/exhaust system improperly connected and the roofing material caught fire. -
Yea, over a decade ago! And Nissan offered the feature on a relatively moderately priced model, the T32 generation X-Trail/Rogue
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
Top Downloads
-
