Oh boy😬

While I applaud efforts to improve the customer service experience, I would say that’s a pretty optimistic goal.    There are things they could be doing that will prevent their vehicles from having to be brought in for service In the first place. Bringing more parts manufacturing in house and not beating up suppliers to more effectively control parts quality and more efficient engineering to start with.  Seems like engineering is heading that direction hopefully the other will as well. 

I am liking what you have going on here.     I don’t disagree with you, but I still like the names. But if you want to create something unique and defining, come up with a new name. Ford Authority referenced Navigator Sport today, which is a terrible idea.  The two vehicles wouldn’t be comparable in style/type, with respect to the Navigator.  They referenced the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport, which do share quite a bit of design language, but this scenario will be nothing like that.  

Maybe the Mach-E/Edge replacement and a Nautilus-adjacent Lincoln.  Here is my own attempt at a T6 Lincoln with AI, but it ended up being more extreme so I may revise it later:

Let the speculation begin on what new Ford vehicles will be built on CD6. Mustang Sedan?

They can barely change my oil in a day 🤣

I mean, if they stop building junk, there won't be as many things to fix so they can get to them quicker 

Definitely not, CD6 is not going anywhere. It will be expanded, not eliminated 

these were ones I did a long time ago. Funny thing is, you can see these in the background in one of Biondis first videos about creating his Lincoln bronco