It's sad that they sold from June to November.     

Not a bad tradeoff if you think of it in the context that Maverick allowed Ford to pull back on Ranger so it can build more higher profit margin Bronco, which is basically what happened. 

Here's a Ranger/Maverick comparison since the 2019 Ranger debuted for those interested...  

To do this subject justice, one would need to write a very long post many pages long, and who the hell would read it anyway; except maybe for you.  But the real problem is that last time I invested a lot of my time in a similar situation, the post was deleted.  I’m not falling for that again.   The thing that matters most is that global CO2 levels continue to increase at alarming rate and nothing you and I discuss here will change that.   Fact is that what we are doing collectively isn’t working, at least not working very well at all given the tremendous investment in time, cost, and resources.  Some of you can joke and laugh all you want — I couldn’t care less.

More on this from today's Autoline Daily.  Go to the 1:38 mark.   https://www.autoline.tv/daily/ad-4070-ford-could-outsource-engines-ram-revives-the-hemi-uk-production-hits-70-year-low/

Indeed, you get the feeling that most people would be thinking that now is the best time to buy instead of waiting a month or so and perhaps regretting it  big time.

It’s Mustang and Ford cars because that’s the only car.

What's up where two lines have the same numbers for Mustang and Ford Trucks?

Explain to me where I'm wrong.  I'm likely not your "average people" as I do have a BS in electrical engineering and 20 years working with and for a utility company, so I do have a bit of background in this area.