I'm just stoooopid!

I see what you guys are saying, but I feel like if you developed a really flexible, cost efficient platform for C class sized vehicles, modifying it over time to be used for even smaller vehicles wouldn't be an insanely difficult task.    Maybe that's the plan, but it's gonna take awhile so they're partnering with Renault to get products out there quickly and then replace those products with their own platform as the products from this merger reach the end of their shelf life?

Everything we know regarding CE1 is focused on compact models - Maverick, Escape/Kuga, Focus, etc.  I don't know if it was designed to be able to go smaller/into the sub-compact models.   This move makes sense if it's meant for Fiesta sized models (or smaller), otherwise, I'm there with you that it's confusing if it is meant for compacts, which CE1 should cover.

C class is "small" for North America.    Its standard size for the rest for the world. 

I live near the beach and in the summer time I've seen quite a few of those Moke LSV in the area. But its also a low speed vehicle that doesn't go faster then 25 MPH either. 

But CE1 was all about being used for small cars, it's not a platform meant for larger vehicles. 

I saw other articles mention they may target the "golf cart" market....meaning there are areas down here where fancy golf carts are able to drive on the roads, so they're targeting that demographic?  Seems like a tiny slice of the pie to the point of why bother?   But I guess nothing else has worked for Fiat in the US, so why not?

How could it possibly be a Chinese electronics issue that the Chinese electronics aren't working?  All YOU!  DUH!!

As pointed out in the other thread, I'm guessing Ford will use this partnership for smaller vehicles than what they're planning on CE1 at this time - otherwise, it's very confusing.

Can a mod merge this thread in with the existing thread?