I kinda like it...its different

You are 100% correct!

No the whole point of the Mustang Sedan is to help keep the coupe viable.    A Mustang CUV is something all together different and more likely, unless they go the 911 Dakar route with the sedan.     What I guess is going to happen is that Ford will be able share powertrains/harnesses between the CD6 and S650, like they did with CD4 (last gen Fusion in NA) and S550. Powertrains also will be shared with T6 and a lesser degree with T3 (F-150) platform

How about start with Ford wants to fix your car same month….

Thinking that by 2029, CD6 will then be 10 years old and perhaps Ford wanting to do another platform as Explorer….. or, they may just evolve CD6 with wiring /tech updates ect.   The whole thing about sizing of Escape-Edge-Explorer-Expedition- Expedition XL, Just wondering if the larger size of Explorer bumps up against Expedition sales  or whether we should be looking at this regarding BOF lineage and unitary lineage. Everest/Bronco 116” WB to Expedition 122” WB to Expedition XL 131” WB Bronco Sport 105” WB to Territory 107” WB to Equator 112” WB to Explorer 119” WB   Just spitballing here but ther are many choices that could be used to fill in the  product spaces but whether Ford sees advantage to so many choices?  maybe not 

Oh boy😬

While I applaud efforts to improve the customer service experience, I would say that’s a pretty optimistic goal.    There are things they could be doing that will prevent their vehicles from having to be brought in for service In the first place. Bringing more parts manufacturing in house and not beating up suppliers to more effectively control parts quality and more efficient engineering to start with.  Seems like engineering is heading that direction hopefully the other will as well. 

I am liking what you have going on here.     I don’t disagree with you, but I still like the names. But if you want to create something unique and defining, come up with a new name. Ford Authority referenced Navigator Sport today, which is a terrible idea.  The two vehicles wouldn’t be comparable in style/type, with respect to the Navigator.  They referenced the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport, which do share quite a bit of design language, but this scenario will be nothing like that.  

Maybe the Mach-E/Edge replacement and a Nautilus-adjacent Lincoln.  Here is my own attempt at a T6 Lincoln with AI, but it ended up being more extreme so I may revise it later:

Let the speculation begin on what new Ford vehicles will be built on CD6. Mustang Sedan?