ANTAUS Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 And the hood is closed by the way, it just looks open. LINK-Edmunds.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AM2 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 And the hood is closed by the way, it just looks open. LINK-Edmunds.com Not bad at all... its called Lexus "LF-A" by the way. More photos here: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/20/video-l...okyo-unveiling/ Video: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardJensen Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 hmf. An ugly GT90 that's only 8 years too late. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 I wonder if Buick will get a Corvette twin now, since that's the "Lexus fighter?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Yuck, I don't like those headlights. The back is ok, but that spoiler looks ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Totally not feeling it, I kinda see a Supra from the front and the rear end bumper is a rip off an R8. The intakes on the sides look retarted too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Something Pikachu would drive... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 This car looks like it was designed by committee.....one group did the side, one did the front, and one the rear....nothing matches. I guess this is what happens when Lexus tries to inject "design" into a vehicle.... :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blazerdude20 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Not bad at all... its called Lexus "LF-A" by the way. More photos here: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/20/video-l...okyo-unveiling/ Video: no its not anymore... the concept was LF-A but toyota changed the name to LFA for the production version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Nothing of it's design has anything remotely to whats being used in any current Lexus. And that says alot since most of the Toyota lexus stuff looks and probably is designed by the same group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Nothing of it's design has anything remotely to whats being used in any current Lexus. And that says alot since most of the Toyota lexus stuff looks and probably is designed by the same group. And do you think that's a good or bad thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Review LINK-Edmunds.com I guess you can just buy a Ford GT and save yourself a few $100K's... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Review LINK-Edmunds.com I guess you can just buy a Ford GT and save yourself a few $100K's... Pfft, they want $400K+ for that thing? I agree with you....go for a GT......I saw a black w/ silver stripes GT the other day. Beautiful vehicles the GTs are... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AM2 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 (edited) no its not anymore... the concept was LF-A but toyota changed the name to LFA for the production version. Well, you get the point LFA, LF-A, the thread title says "LAF". :D Additional photos: More at http://www.netcarshow.com/lexus/2011-lfa/ Edited October 21, 2009 by AM2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 $400,000? Whew okay...got that all out... Oh wait. No I didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 On a serious note though...we waited this long for THIS?? Really? It looks like it was designed 10 years ago. Reminds me of the last gen 350Z. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Actually, it was designed 10 years ago...according to another article, they started this in 2000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Actually, it was designed 10 years ago...according to another article, they started this in 2000. Yeah I know. They've showed a couple concepts and there have been spy photos popping up for years. I just find it kind of sad that it took them so long to develop this if they didn't really even change anything over that time span. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Actually, it was designed 10 years ago...according to another article, they started this in 2000. Worked for Nissan with the GT-R. 2009 performance - 1985 looks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8-X Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Ewww! Not feeling it. Now I do kind of like the rear (except the tri-exhaust pipe setup). Otherwise the rest is not appealling. And for the $400K price tag, I'd also pick up a GT40 or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Actually, it was designed 10 years ago...according to another article, they started this in 2000. ...and I thought GM was slow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Worked for Nissan with the GT-R. 2009 performance - 1985 looks. Did it really work for Nissan though? I sure heard a lot about that car prior to and during its launch, but I haven't heard squat about it since, except for lawsuit settlements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanh Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 (edited) Ewww! Not feeling it. Now I do kind of like the rear (except the tri-exhaust pipe setup). Otherwise the rest is not appealling. And for the $400K price tag, I'd also pick up a GT40 or two. $400k...Ferrari 430 replacement first for me thankyou....WITH change....oh, AND desirabilty.... Edited October 21, 2009 by Deanh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Did it really work for Nissan though? I sure heard a lot about that car prior to and during its launch, but I haven't heard squat about it since, except for lawsuit settlements. I just meant Nissan already pulled it off. Never said it worked well..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papilgee4evaeva Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 $400k...Ferrari 430 replacement first for me thankyou....WITH change....oh, AND desirabilty.... And, if you don't live anywhere near California or the Northeast (DC on up), a house. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.