Jump to content

2025 Ram 1500


rmc523

Recommended Posts

2025 Ram 1500 adds 'unlimited' range Ramcharger EV and Hurricane I6 power - Autoblog

 

The Ram 1500 has gone from being the newest (and nicest) pickup on the market to the oldest in the space of just a few short years. The Stellantis truck build is looking to leapfrog the competition yet again for the 2025 model year, bringing new turbocharged, six-cylinder engines in place of the old iron-block Hemis and introducing a range-extended electric model with a bladder-busting 690 miles of total theoretical range — and you never have to visit a charging station if you don't want to.

Put another way (and Ram did in its announcement, multiple times): the range on the 2025 Ram 1500 Ramcharger is effectively unlimited. Thanks to its onboard generator (which looks like, sounds like and in fact is simply a 3.6-liter Pentastar V6), there's no such thing as a dead drive battery unless you run out of gas. In the words of Ram brand CEO Tim Kuniskis: "Range anxiety, gone."

 

2025 Ram 1500 Tungsten

2025 Ram 1500 Tungsten

2025 Ram 1500 Ramcharger

2025 Ram 1500 Ramcharger

Edited by rmc523
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DeluxeStang said:

I just don't see the point of this really. By the time this thing actually comes out, we're gonna be having EV trucks with 500-600 miles of range as is. I wouldn't be surprised if T3 is one of them. 

 

This seems like it would have been a game changer 10 years ago, but now, not so much. 


I’ll believe this when I see it.  IMO, this is a great product that covers all the bases for the transition to BEVs. It has good electric range and ICE for those areas that have poor charging infrastructure.  Kuniskis is right about eliminating range anxiety with this setup, and it doesn’t lack performance.  If the price is right, I think they will sell a ton of these.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, DeluxeStang said:

I just don't see the point of this really. By the time this thing actually comes out, we're gonna be having EV trucks with 500-600 miles of range as is. I wouldn't be surprised if T3 is one of them. 

 

This seems like it would have been a game changer 10 years ago, but now, not so much. 

 

Good points DeluxeStang. Regulatory compliance comes to mind, but silvrsvt's suggestion that government agencies may wise up and disallow 2025 Ram 1500 Ramcharger from qualifying for incentives intended for true zero-emissions vehicles is a real possibility.

 

As you mentioned, the technology used for Ramcharger may have been worthwhile a decade ago, but nowadays is effectively obsolete. And Stellantis' claim that "the range on the 2025 Ram 1500 Ramcharger is effectively unlimited" is misleading, just like Toyota's infamous "Self-Charging Hybrid" moniker (which was banned in some European countries).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a PHEV with a really large battery.  Basically the same concept as the Volt.  Which, I would think, is much simpler than a typical hybrid set up.

 

Having an electric vehicle now, the driving experience is second to none.  It's truly amazing, and gets a giggle every time I step on the accelerator.  This concept doesn't eliminate oil changes, or completely eliminate gas station stops, but it's a great alternative for trucks, especially for towing.

 

Wonder how this would work in a Super Duty.  A 2.3L I4 EB sitting up front to charge the battery when you run out of juice.  Would be interesting to see if it could generate enough electricity to supply the necessary power to pull 16k lbs of fifth wheel behind a Super Duty once the battery is empty.  Would be a perfect solution for me if it's up to the task.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that architecture is you lose energy converting ICE output to electricity rather than using the ICE to drive the wheels directly.  That’s why Volt MPG was so much lower than other hybrids when the battery was depleted and also why they had to add a direct connection at high speeds.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, akirby said:

The problem with that architecture is you lose energy converting ICE output to electricity rather than using the ICE to drive the wheels directly.  That’s why Volt MPG was so much lower than other hybrids when the battery was depleted and also why they had to add a direct connection at high speeds.

To me, it seems like the MPG would be irrelevant most of the time.  It only becomes relevant when you tow long distances.  Otherwise, you wouldn’t be using the ICE.  So, someone that tows occasionally (or never) wouldn’t care about the slightly lower MPG because they are running on battery power most of the time.  If you tow all the time, this is probably still not the best option for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CurtisH said:

To me, it seems like the MPG would be irrelevant most of the time.  It only becomes relevant when you tow long distances.  Otherwise, you wouldn’t be using the ICE.  So, someone that tows occasionally (or never) wouldn’t care about the slightly lower MPG because they are running on battery power most of the time.  If you tow all the time, this is probably still not the best option for you. 

 

But that begs the question about how long the ICE needs to run if its never charged too....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, akirby said:

The problem with that architecture is you lose energy converting ICE output to electricity rather than using the ICE to drive the wheels directly.  That’s why Volt MPG was so much lower than other hybrids when the battery was depleted and also why they had to add a direct connection at high speeds.

good point...but what utilizes more energy...charging a battery with just the engines parasitic losses or adding in the whole enchilada...I like the concept, and as someone mentioned, its Volt like...and love the advertising moniker..."unlimited mileage"...wonderfully mis-leading....cant wait for a road test...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CurtisH said:

To me, it seems like the MPG would be irrelevant most of the time.  It only becomes relevant when you tow long distances.  Otherwise, you wouldn’t be using the ICE.  So, someone that tows occasionally (or never) wouldn’t care about the slightly lower MPG because they are running on battery power most of the time.  If you tow all the time, this is probably still not the best option for you. 


It’s relevant if you drive long distances and don’t recharge often.  I was really just commenting on the technology though not so much this truck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akirby said:


It’s relevant if you drive long distances and don’t recharge often.  I was really just commenting on the technology though not so much this truck.

I would hope anyone who bought it would want to recharge it routinely,  but you never know.

 

I agree about the technology.

Edited by CurtisH
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...