I understand your position on turbos. However, I believe you are part of a very small group that feels that way. I doubt it constitutes a large enough market to justify the development of an NA inline six.
I would love to see the hybrid from the ROW Ranger in the Mustang! I would love to see the Fusion come back to Flatrock. I had a 13 titianum with the 2.0 ecoboost and I loved it!
That’s hilarious. Your personal preferences determine what you like or don’t like. When you project those preferences to what mfrs should build and what others should buy then that’s bias.
Ford has been spied testing a shit ton of the newer fusions in the U.S. not just once, but like an insane amount of times. So maybe that hints that they're thinking about bringing the fusion back here?
Not EcoBoost, all turbo, whether Ford or BMW. Would NEVER buy one regardless of how many people do. I don’t follow crowds anyway. If I feel it’s a bad decision, that’s all that matters to me. I don’t personally criticize people who like EB. It’s your money and can spend it any way you want. I’ll continue to do the same.
Actual buyers don’t have a problem with small turbo engines - almost every mfr including Mercedes and other luxury brands have a 2.0L turbo engine. Your obsession with value and efficiency is a minority view and you just make stuff up that suits your views. You also give far too much credit to the average car buyer who usually doesn’t even know what type or size engine they have.
As did Maverick and Transit. What’s the point of comparison, solely because they share Mustang name? IMO it is nothing more than a biased EV site trying to highlight EV success, though both vehicles are completely different. EV and Mach-E success is great, but direct sales comparison seems foolish to me.