I'm the outlier here, but the town next door to me has a ton of minivans (normally a few years old) due to the families having lots of kids, so I see a ton of them.    Oh its been in the news lately too...due to a certain religious group 

You can't even get this right. There is not a single county in the world where 90% of the billionaires inherited their wealth. This claim is flat out dishonest and you continue to make up this crap as you go.          https://www.datapulse.de/en/billionaire-self-made/   In the USA 27% of billionaires inherited their wealth. But that inherited wealth came from their ancestors that created amazing companies. For many of that 27% they continue to invest and grow the family company resulting in more and more jobs. Ford and Walmart are great examples. Their are many others. You are blinded by your jealousy, indoctrination and anger.

A software glitch vs say needing a fuel pump is completely different 

Unfortunately, many advocates of wealth taxes fully understand the dire economic consequences that will result. But they don't care. It is all about how unfair the situation is and these high wealth individuals must be penalized and their wealth redistributed to others. 

For a high series suspension, maybe Expedition IRS? Or, something easier like coils and watts link from Everest….

Corporations, for the record, are taxed on their profits, not their revenue.    Remember EBIT?   Low tax rates on corporations incentivize corporations become more profitable, often at the expense of investing in themselves.    It is no coincidence that wealth inequality was much less when corporate and individual tax rates were higher. 

Wealth taxes are property taxes    90% on the billionaires in this country inherited their wealth from their parents or their parents parents.    This isn't jealousy   They weren't smarter, wiser, or luckier; they were born into the wealth that they used to become wealthier.    Our president is a perfect example of this.    

Would a T6.2 chassis begat a T6.3 variant with a long travel independent rear suspension as opposed to a live axle? Would that be a thing for a Lincoln exclusive derivative?  

Point of Focus for this thread, Bronco was the initial development vehicle on T6.2, so it makes sense to branch off a Lincoln SUV at that level rather than changes to the Everest. Also, parts sharing is much easier as the Lincoln becomes a Derivative of the Bronco, not a completely all new vehicle, big help with financing the project. think, reskinned exterior, softer suspension and superb luxury interiors that is so much easier to achieve within the original product envelope.

A lot of reviews said Camaro was a better performing car but using it as a daily was pretty miserable. Harsh ride, horrible blind spots, tiny trunk.    Mustang did all of that better. Trunk was small but I think the opening was a lot bigger