Well I can think of one.....      

I still fail to understand how losing the rear view camera is a safety issue when your mirrors still work.

There's no need to bring back Mercury

Ford CEO Jim Farley Says Australian Bronco Could Actually Happen   Farley said that the Ford Bronco is "under serious consideration" for its Australian lineup amid plans to establish The Blue Oval as a global off-road icon. "If we want to be the Porsche of off-road, you’ve got to sell the 911," Farley said, referring to the Bronco as "unapologetically American" and a vehicle that helps define the brand just as the 911 does for Porsche. "Porsche wouldn’t sell all the Macans and Cayennes [it does] if they didn’t have the 911 and win Le Mans." "Should we really launch the Bronco lineup here?" Farley said, and when the executive was asked if Ford was thinking about creating a RHD variant for Australia, he replied by saying "yes, absolutely." As for when that decision might be made, Farley added that it would happen "within days," so we might not have to wait much longer to find out.

255K Ford, Lincoln SUVs Recalled Over Image Processing Module Issue   255K Ford, Lincoln SUVs Recalled Over Image Processing Module Issue The defect: in affected vehicles, the Image Processing Module A (IPMA) may unexpectedly reset, resulting in loss of the rearview camera image and advanced driver assistance (ADAS) features, including pre-collision assist, lane-keeping assist, and blind-spot monitoring.

My observation at the dealership I was at when the Mach-E came out was that our buyers were split into three nearly equal groups. We got pretty good at quickly identifying which group folks filtered into. Other areas probably had different experiences, of course. 1. The "I'm saving the planet" buyers. For them, it was about the emissions and environmental impact. Most were coming from a hybrid, usually an import. A few Tesla owners, but not the majority. 2. The "tech forward" buyer. They wanted the most cutting edge tech. This was our Tesla owner who had found that their Tesla was more tech-y, but clearly not built by a car company. 3. The "0-60" buyer. They wanted the performance aspect, the instant torque, and the bragging rights of blowing the doors off anyone who revved their engines at stop lights. We had VERY few Ford owners come in for a Mach-E, and zero Mustang owners. My wife fell somewhere between Groups 2 and 3. She learned how to drive in an off-road racing VW Beetle, and never lost her taste for quick cars, even through our minivan and "jellybean SUV" days. Then again, she's now shifted away from the Mach-E over to a full size Bronco... and she wants the Badlands 2.3 with the performance tune. Her logic was "it's more power than the V6, but it costs and weighs less, that's just smart". 

Ford has always had a higher inventory because of F-series.

They'll add incentives or whatnot to move the product if they need to. 

I can't speak to the radio station, but isn't the temperature permanently locked on the bottom of the center screen?  Just push the up (red) or down (blue) button....    

156 day's supply ÷ 26 average selling days per month gets them to October when the 27s start coming out. Sales aren't linear of course, but a 6 month inventory is concerning. The same with Ford. If the product planners guessed wrong about trims and packages that alone can slow sales plus whatever gas prices do.