Jump to content

UAW Demands 46% Pay Hike


Recommended Posts

FoMoCo is just one of UAW's three major employers and hundreds of smaller employers.

 

Bill Ford may think his paternalism will play well with UAW members, but many know the history of Ford's abusive paternalism before World War II and union recognition, delivered by spying "social workers" and company thugs. The visual of Ford's goons attacking peaceful workers at the Ford Hunger March and Battle of the Overpass is forever seared in their multi generational memories and no Ford is ever going to ever earn their trust, and especially not Bill Ford's latest version of his great grandpa's paternalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, GearheadGrrrl said:

but many know the history of Ford's abusive paternalism before World War II and union recognition, delivered by spying "social workers" and company thugs.


I wouldn’t bet on that. Most of the people younger than me have zero clue about any of that. Hell, there’s some that think there’s a legal limit on how many hours we can work and think Ford is breaking federal law by scheduling OT. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, GearheadGrrrl said:

FoMoCo is just one of UAW's three major employers and hundreds of smaller employers.

 

Bill Ford may think his paternalism will play well with UAW members, but many know the history of Ford's abusive paternalism before World War II and union recognition, delivered by spying "social workers" and company thugs. The visual of Ford's goons attacking peaceful workers at the Ford Hunger March and Battle of the Overpass is forever seared in their multi generational memories and no Ford is ever going to ever earn their trust, and especially not Bill Ford's latest version of his great grandpa's paternalism.

 

Give me a break! The Battle of the Bridge??  How many years ago?  Was Bill Ford even on this earth then?

Oh you forgot about the "five dollar day"..Why don't you talk about the recent UAW leaders who are in the "can"..and if not in jail they paid how much in fines?

 

And as to your comment that many know the history of Ford's "abusive paternalism" probably a greater percentage think Walter Reuther was a tackle for the Lions.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bob Rosadini said:

 

Give me a break! The Battle of the Bridge??  How many years ago?  Was Bill Ford even on this earth then?

Oh you forgot about the "five dollar day"..Why don't you talk about the recent UAW leaders who are in the "can"..and if not in jail they paid how much in fines?

 

And as to your comment that many know the history of Ford's "abusive paternalism" probably a greater percentage think Walter Reuther was a tackle for the Lions.

 

The Battle of the Overpass happened in 1938...when William Clay Ford, Sr. (father of Bill Ford) was a teenager and not even married!

 

Does UAW leadership really believe that they are going to rally the troops by recalling a violent labor dispute that happened over 75 years ago (not to mention that all of the key players in that fracas have been dead and buried for decades)? And this mentality will inspire organization efforts at the transplant factories? Really? 

 

As for Ford's "abusive paternalism" - from what I've seen over the past 40 years, "abusive paternalism" on the part of Ford apparently means paying line workers very good wages and benefits, and handling the UAW with kid gloves. 

Edited by grbeck
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fuzzymoomoo said:


Who, Fain? I would agree but I fear he’s going to be re-elected in however many years when he’s up for it. 

If that's the case, then I really fear for Ford's future. Not just declining competitiveness due to having a much greater labor cost than Tesla and the transplants, but the danger of, as I had suggested earlier, an increasingly radicalized and disgruntled workforce, turning all UAW plants into a version of Chicago, with its dysfunction, corruption, and poor build quality.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gurgeh said:

If that's the case, then I really fear for Ford's future. Not just declining competitiveness due to having a much greater labor cost than Tesla and the transplants, but the danger of, as I had suggested earlier, an increasingly radicalized and disgruntled workforce, turning all UAW plants into a version of Chicago, with its dysfunction, corruption, and poor build quality.


He thinks he can organize Tesla and the imports. He can try if he wants, there’s no harm in trying other than his reputation on the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, grbeck said:

 

 

As for Ford's "abusive paternalism" - from what I've seen over the past 40 years, "abusive paternalism" on the part of Ford apparently means paying line workers very good wages and benefits, and handling the UAW with kid gloves. 


Not to mention being the largest employer of UAW workers in the nation and building more vehicles in the US than anyone else.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, fuzzymoomoo said:


He thinks he can organize Tesla and the imports. He can try if he wants, there’s no harm in trying other than his reputation on the line. 


But don’t hold the current mfrs hostage to try and do it.  Strikes and other adversarial events are the primary reason these transplant workers don’t want a union.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GearheadGrrrl said:

FoMoCo is just one of UAW's three major employers and hundreds of smaller employers.

 

Bill Ford may think his paternalism will play well with UAW members, but many know the history of Ford's abusive paternalism before World War II and union recognition, delivered by spying "social workers" and company thugs. The visual of Ford's goons attacking peaceful workers at the Ford Hunger March and Battle of the Overpass is forever seared in their multi generational memories and no Ford is ever going to ever earn their trust, and especially not Bill Ford's latest version of his great grandpa's paternalism.

 

This is so off-base......

 

For the record, the ONLY reason the F-150 is even built at the Rouge is because of Bill Ford.  I was one of the managers of that '09-14 F-150 program and when that program started we closed Norfolk and were looking for another place to build it.  Tere were other lower-cost options - including some non-UAW facilities.  (Namely Mexico.)    Bill Ford said no way.  They decided to pay a lot more money to make it work in Dearborn.  

 

I keep thinking of those moments during this strike and part of me wishes they'd shut them all down and go non-union across the board.  Would be better for the company in the long run.  

 

There have also been proposals over the years to even relocate the HQ out of the country. (Like Eaton when they "moved" to Ireland.)  But again, the Ford's won't let it happen even though they know it would be better financially in the long run.    

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Bob Rosadini said:

Hmn..I  heard a newscast this AM that said Fain on Friday said there would be no more expansion of striking facilities or words to that affect. Guess the boys at the Ram plant made a move on their own...can't be a case of Fain being misquoted?


Nope, that’s not what he said. He said there would be no more on Friday but there could be more at any time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iamweasel said:

 

This is so off-base......

 

For the record, the ONLY reason the F-150 is even built at the Rouge is because of Bill Ford.  I was one of the managers of that '09-14 F-150 program and when that program started we closed Norfolk and were looking for another place to build it.  Tere were other lower-cost options - including some non-UAW facilities.  (Namely Mexico.)    Bill Ford said no way.  They decided to pay a lot more money to make it work in Dearborn.  

 

I keep thinking of those moments during this strike and part of me wishes they'd shut them all down and go non-union across the board.  Would be better for the company in the long run.  

 

There have also been proposals over the years to even relocate the HQ out of the country. (Like Eaton when they "moved" to Ireland.)  But again, the Ford's won't let it happen even though they know it would be better financially in the long run.    

As a person with first hand knowledge, I value your opinion. Ford's paternalism is a two edge sword, and there are many times when they faced down potential losses and did the right thing during WW2 and the polio and COVID-19 epidemics. On the other side of the sword there is a sad legacy of anti-semitism, violent union busting, and now refusing to share Ford's wealth with the workers who created it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GearheadGrrrl said:

refusing to share Ford's wealth with the workers who created it.

 

Now that's where you and I disagree. 

 

Why do UAW members feel they are entitled to earn more money than the same jobs at Ford's competitors?  Fain & Co accuse Ford Management of greed but that goes both ways. 

 

In this country, we have two groups of plant workers in this industry.  (Non-union and union.)  One of them, who gets paid 10-30% less depending on the metric is currently happy and working and the group that is paid the highest is the one striking.  I can't seem to comprehend that. 

 

The fact of the matter is, that going back years those jobs were WAY overpaid and that's why some other wages have outpaced the UAW factory worker wages.  Just because Ford and GM paid uncompetitive wages before doesn't mean they should keep doing it.  That's one of the things that helped Honda, Toyota, Kia, etc gain footholds in this country to begin with.    They had extra money to actually spend on the cars......

 

If you have 2 pizza companies, and both sell the Pizza for $15:

  • Company A spends $10 on ingredients and $5 on everything else (stores, employees, etc) vs
  • Company B spends $7 on ingredients and $8 on everything else

Who do you think is going to make the better Pizza?  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is how long regular UAW members can tolerate remaining on strike and subsisting on $500/week, I wonder how many of them were originally convinced that this would all over by now. It’s going to get harder as we get into November and December…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jpd80 said:

The question is how long regular UAW members can tolerate remaining on strike and subsisting on $500/week, I wonder how many of them were originally convinced that this would all over by now. It’s going to get harder as we get into November and December…..


Patience is getting thin amongst those who’ve been out the longest. The membership is certainly getting more and more divided the longer this goes on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fuzzymoomoo said:


Patience is getting thin amongst those who’ve been out the longest. The membership is certainly getting more and more divided the longer this goes on. 

I thought so, these are ordinary folks that just want a good deal and to get back to work and earn a decent wage. Hopefully the message that people want this done ASAP filters back up the UAW hierarchy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, fuzzymoomoo said:


Patience is getting thin amongst those who’ve been out the longest. The membership is certainly getting more and more divided the longer this goes on. 

 

Fuzzy,

   Do you think there's a possibility of Fain & Co "rotating the pain", and allowing MAP to go back to work, but then close one of the F-150 plants?  This way, more of the Membership shares in the sacrifices.

 

HRG

Edited by HotRunrGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jpd80 said:

I thought so, these are ordinary folks that just want a good deal and to get back to work and earn a decent wage. Hopefully the message that people want this done ASAP filters back up the UAW hierarchy.

 

With inflation, no one is denying that Ford workers need a raise. But trying to suggest that the Ford Motor Company is running a sweat shop, and cast William Clay Ford, Jr., as a 21st century Harry Bennett, is ludicrous.

 

I know plenty of workers who would be thrilled to receive the current level of pay and benefits, let alone what is being offered by the company. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...