Its because it has a separate glass like the old Explorer or Escape do. I'm guessing its partly due to that since it would be really easy to break it while that was open and then open the hatch.
I haven't heard my wife complain about not having it on her BS vs her old Escape.
Ford invested in the wrong EV. It's a statement of fact.
The market was not demanding 7,000 lbs F-150 EVs but that's where Ford put its eggs in the basket. Meanwhile, there is no replacement for Escape in the US (I mean compact CUV is only the biggest segment in the market so why would Ford want to compete there right?) and Ford Europe laid goose eggs on its collab with VW.
The industry is still moving towards EV. The mandates will probably be modified in some way but they are not going away. Germany, California, China are not going back from >20% EV marketshare to single digit. This train is only going in one direction, the only variable is how fast the train is moving.
The CE1 approach was and still is the right move. They just need to bring those to market quickly before the market leaves Ford behind.
I think I agree with the assessment of it being a move to boost inventory ahead of plant shutdown and product cancellation.
I didn't realize there was no power liftgate on any BS model.
I still disagree with that idea too - the three coexisted for a while, and Edge sales were still healthy.
Depends on how much of it is offset by the affordable EVs...
If you think about it, we are in going into a transitionary period over the next 10-15 years and it also depends on how much the current administration can or is willing to change CAFE, which can always be changed back.
I'd venture to guess that the Bronco will get an EREV setup like the Scout, but I'm not sure how the impact of that is when it comes to CAFE. C sized products that are unibody would move to a EV platform. I'd guess anything under 185 inches overall length or so would get an EV setup in the next 10 years. Larger products like the Ranger and F-150 would get EREV setups also, since I'm guessing they would get better MPGs then a standard HEV or PHEV? Not much data on fueleconomy.gov to see how it works.
I wonder if CAFE footprint rules will push the Bronco Sport to Edge size and the regular Bronco to Expedition size. I believe bzcat already said the next generation Maverick will have to be larger, and I wonder if that would make the Ranger redundant.
Also the shift away from cars to utilities and trucks have lowered volumes dramatically. What made sense for a 300k annual volume vehicle doesn’t necessarily hold for 100k.
Could that change back to more cars? Maybe but I doubt it.
The only reason we have a Ranger is because Bronco shares the platform and factory. As a stand alone product it wouldn’t be worth it.
What you really seem to want is a fun sporty hatchback. There are two problems with that. First is the unintended consequence of CAFE which makes it difficult to sell smaller cars. Second is to amortize the costs you need a lot of volume which can only come from cheaper more boring versions which are commodities and sell mainly on price. We saw this with Focus. ST and RS were great vehicles that nobody bought and they lost money on the rest.
EVs have really killed small cars just because of the shift in resources. They’re the most expendable also thanks to CAFE.
Par
Perhaps I should say things weren't cheap, or affordable, but they were more affordable than they were now is a more accurate assessment. I just believe we're due for a correction with a lot of consumer goods, cars and homes being the most obvious ones.
My folks bought a 7 bedroom three story home in the suburbs outside of Salt Lake for 390 in 2012. Today, that house is worth about 750, at its peak it was over 900 because everyone is moving to Utah, why someone would want to move to Utah, I have no idea lol. But things have just increased so much in value that I don't believe it's sustainable long term.
My grandparents purchased a home in Seattle back in the 60s for about 20k. They recently sold that home for 1.4 million. Off the top of my head, I want to say adjusting for inflation, they paid the equivalent of about 250-300 grand for it. It's a nice house, but no way should it be worth 1.4 million even if it's in a nice area.