Hybrids have a mix of at least two power sources that can drive the wheels.  EVs have only electric motors driving the wheels.  EREVs have only electric motors powering the wheels.  The generator supplies electricity based on state of battery.  These definitions are why Chevy got in trouble trying pass off the volt as an EREV when the gas engine sometimes powered the wheels.

Agreed, at this point, I feel they are using EREV for marketing purposes, not as a descriptor of capability or technology.  

This! Dutch disease

Incidentally, Subaru Outbacks for the U.S. market are no longer assembled in Lafayette, IN. They're now imported from Japan.  

At least it ain't a boring anonymous unibody blob. Here's one parked out front at Dreyer & Reinbold Subaru in Greenwood, IN:    

Yea, here's some more data from the big shots at J.D. Power:      

Yea, same here. Ideally Ford will offer both EREV and pure BEV versions of F-150 Lightning. For a lot of Lightning customers including me, a gasoline powered on board "generator" in the upcoming EREV version is extra stuff we don't need.   Here's an attempt to clarify the difference between EREV and HEV. Clear as mud? 😄  

The vehicle's performance suffers if Drivers don't charge it. The Data from PHEVs shows that most Drivers don't charge their vehicles. How will this Change with EREVs      The Risk is that range estimates require both a charge and refueling to be realized.  Buyers will have the EV charging penalty, the Gas refueling penalty, and the penalty of having to both, to have max performance and range.  This isn't insurmountable, but it requires buyer education.       See above:  Gas engines are gas engines; you put fuel in them and drive. EREVs are very different.   

The F150 and Super Duty share the same cab, doors, and much of the interior.  They aren't completely separate, though everything below the body as well as the drivetrains are completely different.

And that's probably the use case for 75% of F150 drivers.