Good numbers for Ford; Maverick and Explorer are doing great. On the other hand, Lincoln is not doing well. Navigator is down in its first year based entirely on the new model, and Nautilus is not catching the Corsair customers….I don't understand why they are taking too much time to bring the Chinese model

Ranger sales are already low, and they're reportedly adding a Bronco truck in the same segment, so those desperate to have an ICE-based powertrain could go that route. I get what you're saying......at the end of the day, I'm just throwing out ideas.   My main thought for that is that it being EREV only would certainly fit the bill of "different kind of truck" without following a plan that doesn't make sense of having Bronco truck being at TTP, when it'll share a lot of parts with Bronco at MAP.     Because now you're lumping sales numbers of an unrelated midsize offering into what has always been full size (light duty and heavy duty) offerings.  Just seems disingenuous to me, and a way to both hide a model's lack of sales, and pad another number (F-series).  At that point, call Maverick F-050 and lump it in too!   Bronco truck could be F-075 Bronco!  lump it in too!   I mean, Ford even line items the heavy trucks because they're so unrelated, why would it be "ok" to lump a midsize in?     Look at it as if another company were doing it......would you be ok with it if Chevy called Colorado the Silverado 1000, or Ram called Dakota the Ram 1000 just to throw them into the sales figure?  Or would you think they're just trying to pad a sales number?

900,000 active Ford Pro subscriptions.  That's more important to Ford's bottom line than many people realize.

Maybe, but only if you ignore what ExplorerDude and jpd80 have said.

Yeah it essentially looks like if it wasn’t for the aluminum fire they’d be up right now, successfully absorbing the Escape sales.   also GM trucks being down is interesting. Looks like Ram is the main beneficiary.

HaHa. 5'9"/175cm. Part of the problem for me is I like the seat elevated ~2/3 its travel, but still I find that the apex of the door frame is further back than it is compared to my 2021 Ranger. The best compromise I had was with my 1973 Saab 99LE, which had a compound windshield curvature, whereas the A-pillars were more vertical and the lower edge of the windshield protruded outward. Wider door opening with good Cx.    

damn how tall are you

Why?

This would result in low volume sales for the F-100 and would not make sense. I don’t think EREVs are going to be the savior that many seem to think. Besides, Ford/Farley have stated that EREVs would be applied to full size trucks and SUVs.   F-100 will likely have multiple power train options that will appeal to the mass market. Just like F-150.

Actually good news if you read the details.