Coincides with the reorg. Nice.

I found some good looks from the videos on the website.......     Here's the best look of the beltline height relative to the mirror arm, and the character line, which seems to confirm the beltline will be at the mirror arm height.       Another photo of the actual door sheetmetal at the beltline from one of the videos:     Here's the interior of the door vs. the mirror:       Top of the interior screen and headliner:     Corner of the dash:  

The Mach E may have been a first gen product, but Ford has had extensive electronics in vehicles way before the Mach E existed, so if they had learned how to decrease the cabling in those vehicles, they would have applied that to the Mach E.

I did find this in that website Ford has from the QR code.....           OR, that one design sketch does show a drop down from the front to the mirror:       BUT I actually think we've been focusing on the visual from that sketch......I think the gray one on the top right ais actually closer to what we're getting.  Look at the wheel well shape/detail compared to the screen shot above where the guy is pointing, they look more similar....

If that's the argument to use an E-name on this, it's a weak one, IMO lol.

Same issue as Bronco has now - if you have your top off and it rains, oh well....

If that were indeed true, then Ford would reuse the Pinto name....but, I am guessing that the Pinto name has been permanently banished to the history books. 

This "folk" that considers driving a Ford vehicle is also very interested in the electric vehicle Ford produces.

That might be a compelling Lincoln top...but the issue is where do you put it? And if your out and it rains...then what? LOL

To a point.  Lower pricing will increase sales but only to 20%-25% not 50%.