Its going to be Ram version of the Wagoneer...not midsize SUV

It’s such a crowded space already that it makes me wonder if they will follow through.   https://www.caranddriver.com/rankings/best-suvs/3-row

...or a Dodge.

Reality is that patent is almost certainly not vehicle model specific.  It’s likely generic.  We shouldn’t assume it’s meant only for new BEV truck just because truck looks different on drawings.  Again, I haven’t read patent but seriously doubt it applies solely to CE1 pickup.  Ford may not even use this design at all, but who knows, could just as easily use it on existing models in the future.  Granted, it’s probably limited to unitized designs since body-on-frame may be next to impossible to make work.   Also, the midgate/bulkhead design doesn’t have to roll out in first model year.  If it’s an option then Ford could concentrate on building simpler and cheaper trucks initially and then expand offerings in a few years.  On the other hand Ford could use design on CE1 as standard from onset but that would compound risks significantly IMO.  Just saying we shouldn’t read too much into a patent application.

Huh?  Transit and F150/250/350/450/550 are much bigger in commercial sales.

I get where you're coming from, this is a relatively expensive and complex thing to include in a vehicle that's meant to be all about low cost and simplicity. But a thought occured to me, no doubt Ford is targeting both commerical and retail buyers with this vehicle. A lot of those commerical buyers and some retail buyers really want that additional bed storage, to the point of asking for 2 door, long bed trucks.    But by offering a design like this, Ford could create something that offers both the benefits of 4 door crew cabs, and long bed 2 door trucks. Something that allows you to carry people in the backseat for when you want, and significantly improving cargo space when you need to, all in one vehicle, the best of both worlds.    That could pay dividends in the future. Instead of needing to produce a 2 and 4 door cab, with carrying wheelbases and bed lengths, you just make one configuration, like the maverick has now. Saving a lot of money with reduced tooling, manufacturing, and engineering costs, while also creating a more flexible product that's better for the consumer.

Agreed, if this thing has a shorter hood/longer bed than a maverick, let's assume the bed is 5 ft compared to the mavs 4.5 ft. With this pass through, you're probably looking at 6-8 ft of total storage space, in something with a similar footprint to the maverick. 

I think the issue-at least from my perspective is class 6 and 7.  The class 8 ship has sailed in 1998.   They may be a generic truck, but they compliment the rest of the Ford line below as well as the dealer network.  And truly the "commercial market" is a class 6 and 7 market.  If not look at the class 8 manufacturers that have spent money to enter it!  What do they see that Ford does Not.

Going by that teaser photo, I'm guessing its a new grill and bumper to make it look more like a Ram vs a Jeep...

Thinking that this is aimed at the likes of Maverick buyers, people who don’t need BOF  like Ranger and more usable space in back for people who want more than a Utility.   The thing Ford must not do is over hype this and retry to be all things to all buyers. Its a great package but don’t spoil it by giving buyers false /misleading impressions.