Try this version from the Singaporean newspaper: https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/hondas-car-troubles-began-long-before-its-disastrous-bet-on-evs

These sentences sum it up:   Weak results from its core car business predates any ongoing issues with EVs.   The slow decline of Honda’s car operations can be traced back more than a decade to a time when management was fixated more on volume and variety than product quality or capital efficiency.    In 2012, then CEO Takanobu Ito set an audacious goal of doubling annual sales to six million vehicles within five years.   While Mr Hachigo, who succeeded Mr Ito as CEO, shifted the focus away from chasing sales targets, Honda never recovered its mojo even as rivals such as Hyundai Motor and BYD began taking away market share.   Honda’s global sales volume peaked in 2019 at 5.32 million vehicles; it expects to sell 3.3 million in the fiscal year ending in March, down from 3.7 million a year ago.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/the-raptor-rivaling-toyota-tundra-might-have-a-name-trd-hammer   Did Toyota even do the sniff test with this name? Nice TURD Hammer you got there!    

Wondering if that Mach E mule with wider track was a SWB GE2 mule for 2 row Lincoln? it’s possible to read way too much into these concepts but it’s fun…..

Googled it and hit two more paywalls - autonews and bloomberg.  Do people really pay for news you can get free elsewhere?

They do that all the time. It’s stupid AF. 

What was the gist of it?

They didn't throw away the design, just the platform.  I'm 90% sure that's what it was going to look like.

I think "It was pretty good for a piece o' shit" describes Kia and Hyundai quite well 🤣.

Well then don't think 🤣. But no, in all seriousness, if Ford ever brought an off-road supercar like that to market, I could see it using similar windshield tech to the gt. Which in turn uses a similar type of glass to smart phones. It's apparently a lot more resilient against impacts than normal glass.