Lightning should have 150 miles of range from the battery before the erev has to kick in.

Did you like the design from other angles more than you like it from the side view out of curiosity?

No information I could share publicly but I can say I have NOT seen any other angles of this one. I have seen other angles of a similar car. I'm assuming it was one of the themes that didn't make it as far as this model. Same shape, different lighting elements, details, etc.

Hyundai made one that looked like that and it's getting discontinued. I think this will have the same fate. Why can't they make a classy styled EV?

I don't think I've ever seen one of those on the road, so the decision is okay with me. It's not like I'll miss it.

While not hideous, it certainly is not very inspiring either...thankfully, it was put out of its misery before it hit the market....would have been a sales dog for certain. 

Technically, couldn’t they set the home chargers with a charging fee based on usage? Also have it on the public charging stations too. Sort of a gas tax.  

That would need a tape measure on the side, saying you must be LESS that 54" tall to sit in the 3rd row. Overall, I agree, it's not that bad.   HRG

Thank you for sharing this. Are there other angles out there, or do we just have the side for now?

This came up in the most recent discussion on Ford EVs, where this photo was posted claiming it was the three row. I was sceptical at first, assuming it was AI, but doing a google lens search shows it as the banner image for Doug Field's LinkedIn profile. That's the guy in charge of the skunkworks Ford's.    So this is probably legit. I'd be curious if people who've seen the design could chime in an confirm if this is it. It's not great, but not as bad as what I had in mind.