it’s a patent rendering.  So sure, we don’t get the full story of actual shadows, look, etc, we get the basic idea of it. i agree that I’ve never really been a fan of the original FJ’s design either, but they could’ve done better. also, while I like the current Bronco better, I always liked that 2003 concept and actually still think it looks pretty good.   agreed.  The rest is maybe ok/could look better in real life/real photos, but that c-pillar is too weighty. ive come to like the new Land Cruiser/GX design, so they can do something good looking, but this is a big miss

I think Ford targeted the markets that needed more affordable models right away. In the Philippines (one of the Territory's strong markets) the PHEV BYD Sealion 6 is gaining market share and Ford's Territory sales are down. Coincidence? They have similar pricing. Electrified vs traditional ICE.   

It is somewhat surprising the CT is outselling the Lightning since its the newest and has polarizing styling. 

Gee, I thought Tesla sales were tanking from boycotting Musk.

Thanks China!    https://carbuzz.com/features/9-chinese-copycat-cars-that-angered-automakers/

Happens all the time.    https://www.drive.com.au/news/2023-ford-everest-wildtrak-patents-surface/

Since when do car companies patent vehicle designs?

They are based off a patent drawing   So yeah this is what is going to look like 95%   The C pillar is what really kills it. 

Have you driven a solid front axle 4x4 before. With tires at 60+psi

Yikes my friends. Toyota design is very hit or miss, and this is a miss for me. The combination of the stubby hood and thick c-pillar looks so disproportionate. It's basically the opposite of a bronco sport, which is good looking as hell, maybe even better looking than the full sized bronco imo.