Peak electrical demand is between 6 pm and 9 p,m which can coincide with people returning from work. It's best to charge during the day, but charging at night would cost less than during peak hours. Which would create a benifit for the EV owner.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=56880#:~:text=The other challenge is economic,GW as of April 2023.
I suspect it's far more complex than reconfiguring Legos. Different door mounts, body mount points, exhaust plumbing, suspension rates, Crash engineering, on & on. If It would've been more economical to build a "Bronger" pickup rather than the one that is already sharing some ROW parts, they would have done that for 2024, After all, this is the company that saves money by deleting the light for the shifter. Therefore a pickup version of the Bronco would be significantly more expensive to build than the current Ranger, and therefore result in less, not more combined sales. @fuzzymoomoo can probably address this better, but I think Ranger's less than stellar sales have more to do with parts shortages than low demand.
If the rumored "Maverick based CUV" is indeed true, here is to hoping Ford names it Escape and continues the line....it's a "good" name without any negative impact....
No, I didn't. I probably should I guess, but it doesn't give me the 'remote features disabled to preserve battery' notifications anymore, so maybe the leaving it parked for 8 hours did the trick for me?