Listening to how “he” pronounced “Louisville…Kentucky” at the start, I’m thinking this is AI slop. That would certainly explain the mismatched imagery and iffy “facts” mentioned in this thread.
When I first thought about it I was thinking that a hybrid Bronco could be a way I could get a Ford hybrid midsize pickup. Then started thinking about the removable doors and roof does not match my needs or use case. I would never take it off road. I'd be paying for a lot of capability I would never use.
Ranger is fine, the US needs to push Bronco production and sales because
it carried a lot of the development costs of T6.2. Ranger/Everest are global
vehicles and their costs are well amortised.