Anthony Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 (edited) Article with lots of pics: https://www.carscoops.com/2022/07/2023-chevrolet-colorado-grows-up-techs-out-and-goes-turbo/ B-Roll: A few pics: Edited July 28, 2022 by Anthony 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 Definite improvement. Still not a fan of the Chevy design but it is nicely done. I don’t understand the “entry level” 2.7L I4 turbo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice-capades Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 36 minutes ago, akirby said: Definite improvement. Still not a fan of the Chevy design but it is nicely done. I don’t understand the “entry level” 2.7L I4 turbo. Agreed. I think it looks far better than the Silverado, design-wise. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 Is it really cheaper to detune the 2.7L rather than use a 2.0L as the base engine? Quote Three different versions of the engine will be available, and the entry-level unit produces 237 hp (177 kW / 240 PS) and 259 lb-ft (351 Nm) of torque. Both numbers are a sizable improvement over the old 2.5-liter four-cylinder, which cranked out 200 hp (149 kW / 203 PS) and 191 lb-ft (258 Nm). The mid-level engine comes standard on the Trail Boss and Z71, while also being available on the WT and LT as an option. It packs 310 hp (231 kW / 314 PS) and 390 lb-ft (528 Nm) of torque, which doesn’t sound like a huge improvement as it only has 2 hp (1 kW / 2 PS) more than the old 3.6-liter V6. However, the torque figure has grown a substantial 115 lb-ft (156 Nm) and it puts competitors to shame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mackinaw Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 To me, the front end is a bit busy, but it does look like a Chevy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rperez817 Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 52 minutes ago, akirby said: I don’t understand the “entry level” 2.7L I4 turbo. From a marketing standpoint, I think GM wants to use a pricing model for 2023 Colorado that's similar to the current model, which has 2.5L 4-cylinder gasoline as the "entry level" engine, 3.6L V6 gasoline engine as the mid-level upgrade priced at $1,250 additional, and on the ZR2, the 2.8L 4-cylinder Duramax diesel engine as the high-end engine priced at $3,670 more than the V6. 20 minutes ago, akirby said: Is it really cheaper to detune the 2.7L rather than use a 2.0L as the base engine? Yes. The different tunes for 2.7L engine (L3B) are controlled mostly by the engines' software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan7 Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 Good looking truck. The updates make the truck more competitive, but the Zr2 is heavy. The Ranger Raptor is far better than the Zr2, but the Chevy looks good. I still think the EB 2.7l is coming to the Ranger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLPRacing Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 1 hour ago, akirby said: Is it really cheaper to detune the 2.7L rather than use a 2.0L as the base engine? It would make production a lot easier. I bet they didn't sell many 2.0L trucks and probably won't sell many with the "entry-level" 2.7L engines either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 4 hours ago, Broncofan7 said: I still think the EB 2.7l is coming to the Ranger? It wouldn't surprise me. We already know the Raptor is getting the 3.0. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 My first thought was it's a mistake getting rid of the V6 when it's looking like the new Ranger is getting one but after seeing those power numbers I changed my mind. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Handler Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 It looks pretty svelte for a truck. I'm still not a fan of Chevy's overwrought styling, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 12 hours ago, fuzzymoomoo said: My first thought was it's a mistake getting rid of the V6 when it's looking like the new Ranger is getting one but after seeing those power numbers I changed my mind. It’s an I4 but it’s 2.7L same displacement as Ford’s V6 and just as much if not more power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AM222 Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 (edited) 17 hours ago, Broncofan7 said: Good looking truck. The updates make the truck more competitive, but the Zr2 is heavy. The Ranger Raptor is far better than the Zr2, but the Chevy looks good. I still think the EB 2.7l is coming to the Ranger? Makes sense if Ford wants to compete in the torque wars for regular models (we all know the Raptor version will have tons of torque). The regular Ranger will need an optional engine above the 2.3 EcoBoost. Speaking of 2.3 Ecoboost, I noticed in the new VW Amarok's press release, some markets will be available with a 2.3-liter turbocharged gasoline engine with 302PS (298hp) and 452Nm (333lb-ft) of torque. I compared it to the other 2.3 EcoBoost engines in Ford pickups and SUVs. Amarok 2.3 (EcoBoost) turbo: 298hp and 333lb-ft Bronco 2.3 EcoBoost: 275hp and 315lb-ft Bronco 2.3 EcoBoost (with premium fuel): 300hp and 325lb-ft Ranger 2.3 EcoBoost: 270hp and 310lb-ft Ranger 2.3 EcoBoost (with EcoBoost Power Pack Performance Calibration): est 315hp and est 370lb-ft Ford Explorer 2.3 EcoBoost (rated with premium fuel): 300hp and 310lb-ft Edited July 29, 2022 by AM222 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-dubz Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 ZR2 looks good. The front looks a bit like a 4Runner on that trim. Current ZR2 is around $45k. Is it a competitor with the ranger raptor or would it be a step down? Weren’t we expecting the raptor to be around $50k? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 2 hours ago, AM222 said: The regular Ranger will need an optional engine above the 2.3 EcoBoost. I'm thinking the 2.3L with the Powerboost 10 Speed should be able to take care of that problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 24 minutes ago, silvrsvt said: I'm thinking the 2.3L with the Powerboost 10 Speed should be able to take care of that problem. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan7 Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 3 hours ago, AM222 said: Makes sense if Ford wants to compete in the torque wars for regular models (we all know the Raptor version will have tons of torque). The regular Ranger will need an optional engine above the 2.3 EcoBoost. Speaking of 2.3 Ecoboost, I noticed in the new VW Amarok's press release, some markets will be available with a 2.3-liter turbocharged gasoline engine with 302PS (298hp) and 452Nm (333lb-ft) of torque. I compared it to the other 2.3 EcoBoost engines in Ford pickups and SUVs. Amarok 2.3 (EcoBoost) turbo: 298hp and 333lb-ft Bronco 2.3 EcoBoost: 275hp and 315lb-ft Bronco 2.3 EcoBoost (with premium fuel): 300hp and 325lb-ft Ranger 2.3 EcoBoost: 270hp and 310lb-ft Ranger 2.3 EcoBoost (with EcoBoost Power Pack Performance Calibration): est 315hp and est 370lb-ft Ford Explorer 2.3 EcoBoost (rated with premium fuel): 300hp and 310lb-ft Good analysis! I think that the 2.3l carries over, with the 2.7l the upgrade engine for the regular trucks, and the Ranger Raptor obviously has the 3.0l. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92merc Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 I'm betting Ford won't even bother with the 2.7EB in the Ranger. Just 2.3 Ecoboost, 2.3 Powerboost, and Raptor with the 3.0EB. My reasoning is I think Ford wants to push it's hybrid/plug in options. If they can get enough batteries for that strategy. I'll take a PowerBoost BTW. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papilgee4evaeva Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 On 7/28/2022 at 7:57 PM, fuzzymoomoo said: It wouldn't surprise me. We already know the Raptor is getting the 3.0. Is Ford phasing out the 2.7EB? This makes it seem like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzymoomoo Posted July 31, 2022 Share Posted July 31, 2022 1 hour ago, papilgee4evaeva said: Is Ford phasing out the 2.7EB? This makes it seem like it. I think you misunderstood what I was saying. Because the 3.0 is going in the Raptor I think it stands to reason the 2.7 will probably be available too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papilgee4evaeva Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 19 hours ago, fuzzymoomoo said: I think you misunderstood what I was saying. Because the 3.0 is going in the Raptor I think it stands to reason the 2.7 will probably be available too. I sure did. My mind read "Raptor" as simply "Ranger." ??♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 On 7/29/2022 at 1:06 PM, 92merc said: I'm betting Ford won't even bother with the 2.7EB in the Ranger. Just 2.3 Ecoboost, 2.3 Powerboost, and Raptor with the 3.0EB. My reasoning is I think Ford wants to push it's hybrid/plug in options. If they can get enough batteries for that strategy. I'll take a PowerBoost BTW. ? Well, they're already installing it in Broncos, so it's not as if you're having to rearrange the assembly line/platform for the motor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CKNSLS Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 On 7/28/2022 at 12:43 PM, akirby said: Definite improvement. Still not a fan of the Chevy design but it is nicely done. I don’t understand the “entry level” 2.7L I4 turbo. Doesn't it have about the same numbers as the small Ford 2.7 turbo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 hour ago, CKNSLS said: Doesn't it have about the same numbers as the small Ford 2.7 turbo? No - go back and read the article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.