Well you do have a major limitation of having to compensate for the battery pack taking up space in the middle of the car-which isn't exactly trivial in a sedan.
Clearly Ford strayed from Mulally’s strategies, which I would argue was a poor decision. Could some of Mulally’s approach use some tweaking, perhaps, but the general strategy was sound. Ford has a commitment problem.
My guess is the mach-e nose was added because Ford wanted to make sure people knew this version of the puma was electric. But here's the dealio, brands seem to think that electric car buyers want their cars to look drastically different, most buyers don't. Just use ev tech to make the car look better, you can do things like pushing the wheels to the corners more, giving more sculpture to the hood because there are no engine clearance issues, etc.
Just give us a better design, not some science project on wheels. Let's stop with the no grille, sea of blank metal look evs have, or the desire that designers have to push the a-pillar super far forward because there's no engine. It's like the lack of limitations EVs have provided has made designers forget how to make a good looking car.
Every time the outside temperature drops below 35 degrees, the Power Distribution screen shows that the rear wheels stay under power regardless of distance driven or speed.
This problem has been there since the day I leased the vehicle. I took the vehicle to the dealership twice but they say there is no DTC and therefore there is no problem.
They ignored the fact that the power distribution screen shows the real wheels are always powered. When the outside temperature goes above 35 degrees, the power distribution screen shows the rear wheels without any power after the normal distance driven.
Any idea why temperature has an affect on the power going to the rear wheels? Or is it just a bad sensor/programming error somewhere?