Missing the point, on unibody Lincoln vehicles they share the same greenhouse, with some changes to make them look different then their Ford products.   The Everest greenhouse can be tweaked or made to look different and the rest of the sheet metal from the greenhouse below would be different.   The Ranger and Bronco 2 doors share at least 1/2 of the stampings that the other models use. 

Because Everest is a Ford not a Lincoln?    I think if Lincoln was going to do this, they would be better off starting with a new design rather than rebadge a Ford... they haven't done that in over a decade so why would they start again?   T6 is body on frame chassis... designing a new body and new interior fit for purpose is not going to break the bank. Ford already has 9 different body shell for T6 (Ranger single cab, Ranger supercab, Ranger double cab, Amarok 2 door, Amarok 4 door, Bronco 2 door, Bronco 4 door, Everest, Dadao) - it is one of the highest volume program besides F-Series and Transit. Adding another body won't be that difficult... if Ranger single cab or 2 door Bronco can pay for themselves, so would a Lincoln SUV on similar volumes.

I'd be tempted by an EV with the performance of a GTI, but looks like GM blew that opportunity with the Bolt (again).

delete duplicate post

I don't think there are many markets besides Middle East, North America, and Australia ready for a 5+ meter SUV from a non-premium brand.    Middle East loves big SUV but has cheap gasoline so Ford probably won't bother.   North America is not going to happen due to tariff on Chinese cars.   Australia... maybe? 

I saw no reason to start a new thread, but who says there's nothing new from Ford!!??? A buddy of mine informed of this yesterday. Nearest one to New England is apparently on Long Island New York. Maybe when they build that 14 mile bridge, I'll take a ride! I wonder who operates this franchise.   Ford's Garage - Famous Burgers - Craft Beer - Comfort Food

For what it’s worth, I found information on previous Bolt stating that the 200 HP motor’s maximum rated speed was 8810 RPM (think of it as redline), which when geared at 7.05:1 and with fairly small diameter tires limited maximum vehicle speed to 93 MPH.  It should also be interesting to see if new 2027 Bolt has such a low maximum top speed.

The Bronco NE or Basecamp or whatever they are calling it is a LARGE vehicle, its actually bigger then the T6 Bronco in OL. 

No.  The 11.59 to 1 versus 7.05 to 1 difference in gear ratio applies at 0 RPM also.  Think about it, if it didn’t and car was limited to motor torque only at 0 RPM and thus 0 speed the car would never be able to get moving up an incline, not even a minor road grade.

Jeep’s Wagoneer Is Dead. Long Live The Facelifted 2026 Grand Wagoneer | Carscoops     Jeep barely mentioned interior changes, but there’s a new heads-up display on higher-end variants. It features a “significantly larger field of view and a virtual image distance twice that of previous versions.”   Under the hood, there’s a familiar twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-six producing 420 hp (313 kW / 426 PS) and 468 lb-ft (635 Nm) of torque. Unfortunately, Jeep has apparently dropped the high-output variant that developed 540 hp (402 kW / 548 PS) and 521 lb-ft (706 Nm). The big news is an all-new range-extender variant known as the Grand Wagoneer REEV. It borrows heavily from the Ram 1500 REV, which used to be known as the Ramcharger, and features a 92 kWh battery pack as well as a 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 that acts as a generator. It’s slated to be the quickest and most powerful Grand Wagoneer ever created as the company is estimating a combined output of 647 hp (482 kW / 656 PS) and 620 lb-ft (840 Nm) of torque. This should enable the SUV to rocket from 0-60 mph (0-96 km/h) in five seconds flat and have a range in excess of 500 miles (805 km).