Until EVs reach a price parity with ICE, electric vans are always going to be a hard sell to fleets. Beyond the well capitalized Fortune 500 companies like Amazon, most fleet buyers want something inexpensive, reliable, and easy to fix. I am not sure about reliability or repair costs, but BrightDrops were not cheap by any means.
In overall length, its 185 inches long, not exactly small-about the same size as the old 1990s Ranger Single cab.
The Slate is about 11 inches shorter, which makes me wonder how much actual appeal it will have with people once it comes out and they go...oh this is too small.
That appears much larger pickup than Slate, given 4-doors and back seat, but yeah, it goes along with my point that if there was a market for a Slate-size truck, it could have been done already in ICE. And more importantly the price would be much lower than Slate’s.
The first generation Montana (below) was probably closer to Slate in size. Other than being electric, I don’t see much Slate offers to attract enough buyers. And per article, lease payments are higher than those of Maverick; probably due to higher depreciation rate.
Maybe so, but 4,604 units through 3 quarters is pretty bad, and last quarter’s rate of 430 in Q3 was even worse with 85% decline. Ford must be losing money even if considered incremental volume, so what exactly are they gaining from continued manufacturing? I don’t see it, but Ford must have a reason. Still, it would not surprise me to see a similar announcement from Ford regarding E-Transit now that GM conceded first.
Fair comment.
Yes, back in the 1990s just in time gave good increases in efficiency but OEMs like Ford
had to keep outsourcing more and more of its parts and processes- that’s where the
vulnerability comes in, manufacturers are now prepared to risk long stoppages to get
every last possible saving.
I would welcome the Chinese Corsair, I know some here don't agree...Even a Chinese Aviator at this point.
Makes our NA version look like some poverty chariot...