Correct. And while I'd rather have a fixed glass roof than a regular solid roof, I still like the option of opening it. What I'm curious to see is whether it fits within the same opening as the current vista roof, or if they make the opening larger now that they don't have to accommodate the mechanical hardware to open it?
Eh, I'd disagree - there are people out there that want the performance with a more "luxury" interior, vs. the sporty and all-black interior of the ST.
That said, you're also right that for many buyers, the 2.3 would be sufficient.
This seems like a typical "reduce build combos/complexity" move as a model ages....they shifted the powertrain option from one trim to another.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/29/business/tesla-earnings-elon-musk.html
Tesla's full year profit was $7.1B, and down from $15B in 2023. But still more than the $2.76 of credit sales, so something is profitable at Tesla lol.
Whoops, I didn't read closely enough - I missed that his statement was regarding VDS, not IQS.
Disregard my above comments lol.
Let's hope that things continue to improve, and hope that the recall situation resolves itself soon, because even if they're minor issues and/or it's Ford being proactive rather than reactive, it's not a good look, and an easy target for a media that loves a punching bag. We all know how people love to read incendiary headlines these days too and media does it for clicks/ad revenue.
The New Mazda CX-5 Is Almost Here
So much for phasing out the single number CX-_ models. Obviously we can't see full details yet, but looks more or less like the outgoing one from spy shots. It debuts July 10th.
At the moment, there’s over 1,200 platinum 3.0 V6s available at Ford dealers nationwide,
so looks like maybe Ford is dropping the 3.0 V6 in Platinum because of low take rate?