For buyers who want greater performance, Toyota offers the hybrid Corola Cross. Car and Driver tested both the ICE and Hybrid powertrains and found the 0-60 MPH acceleration time dropped nearly 2 seconds, from 9.2 to 7.3. And as expected fuel economy was improved considerably by hybrid at same time.
What’s different and worth noting about Toyota Corola Cross is that fuel economy improved from 30 to 36 MPG at constant 75 MPH by going to hybrid. By comparison, the similar test of Nautilus ICE versus Hybrid resulted in identical 30 MPG at constant 75 MPH. Granted these are rough numbers based on testing only one car and rounding off results so not exact, and obviously the Lincoln is a larger and heavier vehicle that should not be compared directly to Corola Cross in any case, but C/D test data does confirm importance of both hybrid/transmission and engine contributions having a role in hybrid-vehicle optimization.
At steady highway speed of 75 MPH, the Corola Cross hybrid’s Atkinson engine is almost certainly more efficient than their ICE in order to bump fuel economy from 30 to 36 MPG. By comparison the Nautilus’ use of the same engine in ICE and hybrid results in same steady 75 MPH fuel economy, as can be expected. Obviously Nautilus FE improves significantly in city cycle, but not much if at all at steady highway speed.
TO BE CLEAR, ABOVE COMPARES COROLA VS COROLA, AND NAUTILUS VS NAUTILUS TO DIFFERENTIATE HYBRID DESIGNS.
Well in your example you're comparing a family car to a sports car. I'm comparing a crossover to a crossover. You're right, going EV doesn't automatically assume something will be better looking, but it gives you more packaging flexibility. With EVs, you have offer a lower, more curvaceous hood, really push the wheels out to the corners, reduce the size of the overhangs. So there are a lot of things about EVs that lend themselves to being able to create a better looking design.
I'm in the minority here, but I've said before how I wouldn't mind if the next gen escape adopted a baby mach-e look, essentially becoming Ford's Macan, a smaller, more affordable take on the street performance crossover to slot beneath the mach-e. That way, the bronco sport and escape are both iconic, appealing products, that go after drastically different audiences. I like the rugged and boxy look, but I also argue some enthusiasts want a more rounded, coupe like SUV shape, and Ford isn't doing much to appeal to that crowd beyond the mach-e.
This is a $35k Chinese EV that was recently revealed, if the next escape looked anything like this, Ford would have a winner.
Modern gasoline engines are required to reach convert or light off within 30 seconds,
DI +PFI has really cleaned up cold start emissions profile such that
cold start emissions are mostly controlled via low cost particulate filters.
Also, today’s smaller engines also have much less of an emissions problem
than engines did 15 years ago
Ford China’s use of 2.0 EB with hybrid power train is genius in my opinion
I am surprised that the 1.5 EB hasn’t been used similarly but understand
if only one hybrid powertrain was required….
I know that’s a little off topic but I’m enthralled at how good the latest
Nautilus performs, amazing how that solution was there in plain sight.
Just reminds me we will probably be going back to the times of checking the glovebox... "is there a lightbulb in it,or not?"
I read another article a few weeks ago, in which someone from Ford discussed (to paraphrase) that most buyers don't feel a need to have a badge on their vehicle to advertise the engine. Which in my world it's like "Hmm, damn right I want people to see I have the 3.0L V6 AWD, I damn paid for it, and yes that Mustang owner will want that 5.0L V8 GT badge to be displayed. Save pennies by taking that stupid Ecoboost label if they wish to save pennies. Reminds me of the "ABS" label that 80s vehicles would carry...🙄