I’d take the price hike still since the BAMR was an added on option, not a standard feature.
I also can’t wait to find out that the non opening piece of glass costs the same as an option as the opening one…
Whether it made sense to some prospective buyers or not before, it now makes $7,500 less sense which is what matters most IMO. In fairness many other competing EVs are essentially in same boat, with lowest-cost models getting hit hardest as a percent of purchase price. I think eliminating tax credit will also hurt Tesla considerably since their cheapest models make up most of their business. Change will likely hurt Chevy Bolt and Nissan Leaf disproportionately also, along with cheapest Hyundai and Kia.
For many, yes, but not all. IMO that’s how change probably has to happen in this case. Adoption rate in the affordable segment could start slow and build from there. I agree that large-car owners are less likely to downsize a huge amount so not worth pursuing them, but I believe a significant segment of the population, including those who enjoy riding motorcycles, scooters and bikes may try them, especially the young and those who can afford one as a pseudo toy and or extra city-car vehicle. If cars prove fun, low-cost, and safe enough for the price, other buyers should follow. Key IMO is to make them feel cool/desirable to own, not because they’re cheap.
The battery management systems (BMS ) on older EVs are known for poor battery wear.
Lower cost replacements exist for for some models on this list. There is a large market for replacement batteries for Leafs and I3s plus there is a growing market used EV batteries.
Old BMW i3 Gets Double The Range With This New Chinese Battery