-
Files
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
Finally a GM half ton that looks good! What will be interesting is will their new 5.7 and 6.6 liter V8’s, be competitive with Ford’s 5.0 V8 and the next generation 3.5 Ecoboost? Maybe, ford will need aluminum block 5.8/6.8 versions of the Godzilla? edselford
-
By Sherminator98 · Posted
It still makes zero sense to get rid of the Ranger IMO. I could see it being moved, but at the same time getting replaced by something even smaller then the Maverick makes no sense what so ever. plus you’d think that Ford wouldn’t want to have anything jeopardize or impact the CE1 coming out. -
By Sherminator98 · Posted
I’m also guessing that whatever agreements they have with VW and now Renault are affecting the CE1 getting to the EU. -
Listening to how “he” pronounced “Louisville…Kentucky” at the start, I’m thinking this is AI slop. That would certainly explain the mismatched imagery and iffy “facts” mentioned in this thread. -
And to this day, I wonder if they had just kept Mondeo on EUCD (C1+) platform, the FWD and 2.0 EB may have been enough to give Camry a big scare.
-
As far as I can tell, there’s still zero interest in bring Everest to North America
-
When I first thought about it I was thinking that a hybrid Bronco could be a way I could get a Ford hybrid midsize pickup. Then started thinking about the removable doors and roof does not match my needs or use case. I would never take it off road. I'd be paying for a lot of capability I would never use.
-
I meant if the rumors of its demise in the US are true, there’d be no point of bringing Everest here at that point
-
Ranger is fine, the US needs to push Bronco production and sales because it carried a lot of the development costs of T6.2. Ranger/Everest are global vehicles and their costs are well amortised.
-
I think the big question is what happens with Ranger. Everest shares most with Ranger, so they’d have to be paired for it to make sense, IMO
-
-
Topics
-
-
Top Downloads
-
